| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 R 840/15 | 25.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 64/18 | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 1084/16 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 41/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 1045/14 | 15.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 541/18 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 41 AS 969/20 ER | 03.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 7 KA 228/19 | 02.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 KR 219/20 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 KR 237/20 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 379/20 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 402/19 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 773/18 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 R 840/15 | 25.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 64/18 | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 30/10 | 11.05.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 107/12 | 03.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/20 BH | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 17. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 36/11 | 08.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 283/17 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 KR 1028/20 | 07.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 17. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 36/11 | 08.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 283/17 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 7 AL 2738/15 | 19.04.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 594/16 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 8/19 R | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 R 1473/17 | 08.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 264/18 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 3/19 R | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 50 R 533/18 ZV | 30.04.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 278/20 ZV | 07.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 179 AS 6138/17 | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 16. Dezember 2020 | ||
| S 101 AS 6266/16 | 05.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 2630/17 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 1 R 275/17 | 07.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 439/19 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 29 AS 36/19 | 18.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 659/20 B | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 217 AL 1042/16 | 24.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 68/18 | 21.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 48/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 37 KR 292/17 | 13.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 269/18 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 76/19 B | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 KR 568/14 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 132/18 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 15. Dezember 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 326 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 326 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 326 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 64/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-64-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-64-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 87 KA 1084/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-87-ka-1084-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-87-ka-1084-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 541/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-541-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-541-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 969/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-969-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-969-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KA 228/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ka-228-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ka-228-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 219/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-219-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-219-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 237/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-237-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-237-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 379/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-379-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-379-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 402/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-402-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-402-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 773/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-773-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-773-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 R 840/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-r-840-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-r-840-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 30/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-30-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-30-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 36/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-36-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-36-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 1028/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-1028-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-1028-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 283/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-283-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-283-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 8/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-8-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-8-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 278/20 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-278-20-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-278-20-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 179 AS 6138/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-179-as-6138-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-179-as-6138-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 2630/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-2630-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-2630-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 127000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 439/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-439-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-439-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 659/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-659-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-659-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126986 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 68/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-68-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-68-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 269/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-269-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-269-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 132/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-132-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-132-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 64/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-64-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-64-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4c257327ea5ba3e15a83897e46d80501 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6771af0ed5b311b46ecf13e4e9fe6917:0.93252800 1751210190 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.