| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 635/03 | 22.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 217/04 | 22.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 AL 311/99 | 19.02.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 145/02 | 09.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 AS 1346/05 ER | 20.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2875/05 ER-B | 01.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 20.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/04 R | 07.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 08.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 46/04 R | 05.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 KA 1281/02 | 11.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1089/03 | 20.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 72/03 R | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 12 KR 26/01 | 06.06.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KR 848/01 | 19.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 18/04 R | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 2 AL 119/02 | 20.04.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 48/04 | 22.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 26. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 19 KR 106/00 | 03.11.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 20/04 | 15.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 26. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 109/05 ER | 24.03.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 100/05 ER | 20.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 49 SO 43/05 ER | 08.03.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 SO 3/05 ER | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 108/03 | 15.03.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 40/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Sozialgericht Dresden | 25. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 Ka 2910/96 | 27.05.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 B 38/98 KA | 25.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 19 RA 2153/00 | 18.11.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 RA 111/03 | 25.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 119/05 ER | 22.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 B 13/05 AS ER | 22.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 24. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 16 AS 33/05 ER | 10.05.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 22/05 ER | 29.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 AS 5/05 ER | 24.03.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 18/05 ER | 27.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 45 AS 22/05 | 14.02.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1/05 ER | 29.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 AL 230/98 | 13.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 318/01 | 14.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 37/05 R | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 13 U 304/00 | 15.01.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 U 244/01 | 23.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/04 R | 12.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 55/02 | 22.06.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 39/04 R | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 KR 334/02 | 23.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 23/03 | 04.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 9/04 R | 17.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 U 608/00 | 20.07.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 1471/01 | 01.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/04 R | 31.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 13/01 | 24.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 40/03 | 11.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/04 R | 22.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 26 U 90/97 | 26.10.1998 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 52/98 | 02.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 12/04 R | 31.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. August 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3267 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 217/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-217-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:09:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:09:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-217-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 145/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-145-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:09:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:09:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-145-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2875/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2875-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2875-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 7/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-7-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-7-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 46/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-46-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-46-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 72/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-72-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-72-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 18/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-18-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-18-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 48/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-48-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-48-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 20/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-20-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-20-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 100/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-100-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-100-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 108/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-108-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-108-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 B 38/98 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-b-38-98-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-b-38-98-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RA 111/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ra-111-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ra-111-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 119/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-119-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-119-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 22/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-22-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-22-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 18/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-18-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-18-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:10:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:10:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 318/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-318-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:08:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:08:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-318-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 27/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-27-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-27-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 39/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-39-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-39-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 9/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-9-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-9-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 35/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-35-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-35-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 22/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-22-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-22-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 12/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-12-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-12-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 217/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-217-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:09:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:09:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-217-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cf842233d699fcac43a28888434a61d8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e90635acd1ce36d00753b665c11b499e:0.14522800 1755544755 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.