| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 14 KN 999/03 ER | 20.06.2003 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KN 780/03 ER | 15.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Stade | 25.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 31.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 38/04 R | 20.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 03.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 24.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/04 R | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 5 U 187/99 | 15.05.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 97/02 | 26.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 135/04 B | 12.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 6 KR 902/02 | 27.05.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 32/04 R | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 24/01 | 11.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 245/02 | 06.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/04 R | 15.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 13 U 142/00 | 27.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 213/01 | 20.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/04 R | 12.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 26 P 55/97 | 20.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 P 5/02 | 24.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 13/04 B | 12.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. August 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 R 1284/05 ER | 01.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 B 180/05 ER R | 28.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 R 1284/05 ER | 01.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 B 180/05 ER R | 28.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 50 AS 466/05 ER | 11.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 B 208/05 ER AS | 05.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 SO 297/05 ER | 22.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 B 222/05 ER SO | 28.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 949/03 | 15.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 59/04 | 20.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 18 J 154/995 | 10.04.1997 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | VI JBF 70/97 | 29.07.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 1913/03 | 06.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 4/05 | 06.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 4 KR 438/95 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 516/04 WA | 07.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 11. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 19 AY 6/05 ER | 03.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 24/03 | 05.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 SO 296/05 ER | 15.07.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 406/05 ER | 24.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 62 AS 406/05 ER | 24.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 18 AL 1142/02 | 01.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 39 RJ 140/03 | 21.07.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 34/04 R | 03.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. August 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 5 U 79/01 | 21.11.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 U 166/03 | 04.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 5 U 200/01 | 07.08.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 U 158/03 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3270 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3270 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3270 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 81725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KN 780/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kn-780-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kn-780-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 38/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-38-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-38-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 135/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-135-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-135-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 32/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-32-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-32-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83236 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 13/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-13-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:11:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:11:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-13-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 180/05 ER R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-180-05-er-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-180-05-er-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 180/05 ER R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-180-05-er-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-180-05-er-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 208/05 ER AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-208-05-er-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-208-05-er-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 222/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-222-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-222-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 59/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-59-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-59-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => VI JBF 70/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => vi-jbf-70-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/vi-jbf-70-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 4/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-4-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:45:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:45:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-4-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 516/04 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-516-04-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-516-04-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AY 6/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ay-6-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ay-6-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 24/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-24-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-24-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 SO 296/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-so-296-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-so-296-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AS 406/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-as-406-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-as-406-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 62 AS 406/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-62-as-406-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-62-as-406-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AL 1142/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-al-1142-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-al-1142-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 34/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-34-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:12:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:12:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-34-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 U 166/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-u-166-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-u-166-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 U 158/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-u-158-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-u-158-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KN 780/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kn-780-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kn-780-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a0d23d69ea100f5098ffab19b6819673 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2bb78133acf5501bc1bd858216975d62:0.00140600 1755532720 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.