Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 499/16 | 17.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 126/18 | 09.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 79/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 14. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 499/16 | 17.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 126/18 | 09.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 79/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 525/16 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 129/19 | 21.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 3908/15 | 31.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 200/16 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 1907/17 | 28.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 251/19 | 14.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 87/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 116/15 | 14.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 169/17 | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 2700/20 ER | 14.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2772/20 ER-B | 21.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 BA 2343/20 ER | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 3248/20 ER-B | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 2253/20 ER | 03.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2616/20 ER-B | 20.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 21 R 232/13 (SG Lübeck) | 29.06.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 99/17 | 20.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 400/17 | 04.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 57/17 | 24.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 49/18 B | 14.12.2019 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 BA 23/20 ER | 20.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 74/20 B ER | 02.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 30 SF 2/20 E | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 30 SF 2/20 E | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 11. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 424/19 | 07.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 53/17 | 18.04.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 120/18 | 01.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 15/20 R | 20.10.2020 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 859/15 | 04.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 558/18 | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 1/19 B | 25.04.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 50/12 | 09.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 31/18 | 06.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 30/19 B | 27.05.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 487/14 | 30.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 118/17 | 29.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 39/17 B | 18.10.2017 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 302/12 | 14.04.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 157/15 | 28.04.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 SB 382/19 | 24.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 160/20 ER | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2020 | |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 2625/17 KL | 18.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 90/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 42 BA 9/18 | 23.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 104/19 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 25/20 B | 05.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 SB 3301/17 | 25.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 2932/18 | 28.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 4/19 R | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 6 AS 2157/14 | 30.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1327/17 | 05.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 11/20 R | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 499/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-499-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-499-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 126/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-126-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-126-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 129/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-129-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-129-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 200/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-200-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:26:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:26:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-200-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 251/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-251-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-251-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 169/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-169-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-169-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155457 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 2772/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-2772-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:23:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:23:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-2772-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 3248/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-3248-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:17:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:17:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-3248-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2616/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2616-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:17:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:17:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2616-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150004 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 99/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-99-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-99-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 400/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-400-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-400-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 74/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-74-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-74-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SF 2/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-sf-2-20-e-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-sf-2-20-e-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SF 2/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-sf-2-20-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-sf-2-20-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 424/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-424-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-424-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 53/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-53-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-53-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 859/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-859-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-859-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 50/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-50-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:39:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:39:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-50-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 487/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-487-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-487-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 302/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-302-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-302-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 160/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-160-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-160-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 2625/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-2625-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-2625-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 104/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-104-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-104-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 4/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-4-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-4-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 11/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-11-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-11-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 499/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-499-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-499-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a500ef6d3f5902284b03dcacff70c976 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e776c536a956c6924d24dbff02baa423:0.36255900 1751243017 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.