| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 2 EG 10/99 | 12.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 EG 5/01 | 19.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 1/03 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 EG 3055/02 | 30.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 4373/02 | 28.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 2/03 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 34 KR 86/04 ER | 24.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 B 16/04 KR ER | 08.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/04 S | 07.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 16 RA 1070/99 | 26.04.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 RA 109/01 | 17.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 8/03 R | 09.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 1161/00 | 14.06.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 388/02 | 08.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 43/03 R | 17.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | S 4 KR 50/00 | 13.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 4 KR 19/01 | 15.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 27/02 R | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RA 748/03 ZV | 24.08.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 539/04 | 01.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 KN 132/02 U | 20.02.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KN 72/04 U | 13.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 11/02 | 11.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 1. Juli 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 VU 3/01 | 28.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VU 2/04 | 01.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 VJ 1/96 | 28.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VJ 3/00 | 01.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 U 5032/03 | 21.09.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 399/04 | 03.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 189/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 192/00 | 19.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 334/02 | 16.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 190/03 FdV | 04.08.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 302/03 | 30.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 41 U 556/98 | 17.05.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 294/04 WA | 16.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 123/03 | 19.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 271/04 | 22.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 41 U 565/00 | 19.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 257/03 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 41 U 534/00 | 05.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 250/04 | 30.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 1 U 5008/02 | 29.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 216/04 | 03.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 271/02 | 24.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 201/04 | 22.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 153/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 U 245/03 | 26.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 170/04 | 16.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 U 5070/02 L | 21.01.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 162/04 | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 214/01 | 27.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 114/03 | 16.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 171/99 | 07.02.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 88/02 | 30.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 24 U 459/98 | 11.10.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 69/04 | 30.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3282 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3282 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3282 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:11:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:11:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/04 S [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-04-s [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-04-s/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 8/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-8-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-8-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 43/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-43-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-43-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 27/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-27-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-27-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 539/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-539-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:11:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:11:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-539-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KN 72/04 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kn-72-04-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kn-72-04-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 11/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-11-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-11-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VU 2/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vu-2-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vu-2-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VJ 3/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vj-3-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vj-3-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 399/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-399-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-399-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 334/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-334-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-334-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 302/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-302-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-302-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 294/04 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-294-04-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-294-04-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 U 271/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-u-271-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-u-271-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 257/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-257-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-257-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 250/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-250-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-250-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 216/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-216-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-216-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 U 201/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-u-201-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-u-201-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 170/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-170-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-170-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 162/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-162-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-162-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 114/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-114-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-114-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 88/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-88-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-88-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 69/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-69-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:05:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:05:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-69-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:11:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:11:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7ae0491a4937190a6e55f2ee16b2b2f8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9eeb63bd14fc3a736a3533b3fb8388d4:0.69275500 1755467896 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.