| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 22 KA 2998/01 | 31.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 173/02 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 AL 323/00 | 29.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 89/04 | 18.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AL 1066/02 | 18.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 85/04 | 31.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AL 825/02 | 26.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 6/04 | 08.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AL 1114/02 | 10.12.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 37/04 | 31.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AL 175/02 | 18.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 374/03 | 07.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a AL 110/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AL 232/01 | 26.03.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 242/02 | 26.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 99/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 654/00 | 11.12.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 23/02 | 11.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AL 267/00 | 19.03.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 199/02 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 AL 754/98 | 07.12.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 14/00 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 7 AL 140/02 | 17.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 142/04 | 07.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 AL 1121/01 | 10.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 140/04 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 923/04 ER | 20.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 31/05 KA-ER | 26.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 144/00 | 11.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 P 15/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 30. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 AR 144/97 | 09.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 AL 61/04 | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 4 RJ 443/99 | 14.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RJ 73/02 | 18.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 SO 148/05 ER | 31.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 B 98/05 ER SO | 31.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 11 RA 66/00 | 27.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RA 2/04 | 18.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 53 SO 191/05 ER | 29.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 B 112/05 ER SO | 17.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 32/05 ER | 11.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 32/05 ER | 11.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 53/05 ER | 14.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 15/05 | 13.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AL 87/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AS 22/05 ER | 14.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 9/04 | 26.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 18/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Juni 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3285 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3285 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3285 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 173/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-173-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-173-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 85/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-85-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-85-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 6/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-6-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-6-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 37/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-37-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-37-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 374/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-374-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-374-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112236 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 242/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-242-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-242-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 23/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-23-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-23-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 199/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-199-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-199-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 14/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-14-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-14-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 142/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-142-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-142-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 140/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-140-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-140-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 31/05 KA-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-31-05-ka-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-31-05-ka-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 144/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-144-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-144-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 61/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-61-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-61-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 73/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-73-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-73-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 98/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-98-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-98-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RA 2/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ra-2-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ra-2-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 112/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-112-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-112-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 32/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-32-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-32-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141032 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 32/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-32-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-32-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 141005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 53/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-53-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-53-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 15/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-15-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-15-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 22/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-22-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-22-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 9/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-9-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-9-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 173/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-173-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-173-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6f3ea6206a5476ff3cda73a18e85c53d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f691978b760e89ac4e955cab5431d998:0.43038300 1751822504 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.