| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 91/03 | 26.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 17/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 87/04 | 19.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 166/03 | 15.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 90/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AY 5/05 | 02.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 KR 84/04 | 21.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 9/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 KR 204/04 | 03.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 13/05 R | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AL 150/03 | 12.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 85/04 | 03.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 44/05 ER | 16.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 29. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 56 SO 232/05 ER | 06.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 B 154/05 ER SO | 15.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 28. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 17 KA 71/00 | 30.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 KA 7/04 | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 8 RA 200/01 | 03.09.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 RA 14/04 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 20 U 307/01 | 04.11.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 168/03 | 14.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 1 P 33/01 | 09.04.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 P 20/03 ZVW | 17.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 AL 192/03 | 23.01.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 26/04 | 15.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 20 U 140/99 | 22.10.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 18/03 | 14.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 595/99 | 09.05.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 16/00 | 12.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 5 AS 155/05 ER | 18.05.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 22. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 4 J 452/97 | 18.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 111/02 | 03.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 16. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 3781/04 | 29.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 332/05 ER | 14.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 AL 210/02 | 30.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 RA 794/03 | 04.06.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 KR 216/04 ER | 13.05.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 15 KA 378/02 | 17.12.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 608/04 ER | 22.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 16. Juni 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3286 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3286 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3286 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 91/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-91-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-91-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 87/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-87-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-87-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 166/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-166-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-166-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AY 5/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-ay-5-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-ay-5-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 84/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-84-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-84-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 204/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-204-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-204-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 150/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-150-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-150-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 44/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-44-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-44-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 154/05 ER SO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-154-05-er-so [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-154-05-er-so/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 7/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-7-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-7-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 RA 14/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ra-14-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ra-14-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 168/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-168-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-168-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 P 20/03 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-p-20-03-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-p-20-03-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 26/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-26-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-26-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 18/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-18-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-18-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 16/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-16-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-16-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 155/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-155-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-155-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 111/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-111-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:38:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:38:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-111-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 3781/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-3781-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-3781-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 332/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-332-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-332-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AL 210/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-al-210-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-al-210-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140456 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 RA 794/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-ra-794-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-ra-794-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 216/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-216-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-216-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KA 378/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-ka-378-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-ka-378-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 608/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-608-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-608-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 91/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-91-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-91-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 046251d4d94774cdefe478498d15ab63 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:576ab5befa679f4328229ae521060fe5:0.01181900 1755427666 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.