| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 RA 2351/02 | 21.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 29/04 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KR 34/00 | 20.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 48/02 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RJ 817/01 | 05.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RJ 21/03 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 986/02 | 07.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 4/03 | 22.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 2002/02*8 | 23.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 37/04 | 01.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 26 RJ 1250/96 | 02.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RJ 28/99 | 20.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 AS 19/05 ER | 08.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 6. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 4 AS 47/05 ER | 24.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 6. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 212/05 ER | 01.06.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 3. Juni 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 7 B 15/04 SB | 19.04.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 B 61/04 SB | 13.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 9 AS 57/05 ER | 17.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 B 7/05 AS ER | 15.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 1. Juni 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 AL 328/02 | 21.11.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AL 22/03 | 17.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 11/02 | 08.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 124/04 | 31.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AS 522/05 ER | 22.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 31. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 230/03 | 25.04.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 31. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 157/02 | 15.04.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 31. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 20/01 | 13.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 185/01 | 12.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 38/02 R | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Mai 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 KR 265/99 | 17.04.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 38/02 | 23.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 22 AS 11/05 ER | 23.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 B 9/05 AS ER | 22.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 1/05 | 13.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 91/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 21/05 | 13.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AL 85/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 RJ 42/04 | 13.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 85/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 RJ 11/03 | 03.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 49/03 | 09.05.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 30. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 VG 3/03 | 30.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 3/04 | 01.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3289 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3289 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3289 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 29/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-29-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-29-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RJ 21/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-rj-21-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-rj-21-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 4/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-4-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-4-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 37/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-37-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-37-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 28/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-28-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-28-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 19/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-19-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:24:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:24:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-19-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 47/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-47-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-47-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 212/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-212-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-212-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 B 61/04 SB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-b-61-04-sb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-b-61-04-sb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 7/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-7-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-7-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 22/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-22-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-22-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 124/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-124-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-124-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 AS 522/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-as-522-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-as-522-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 230/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-230-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-230-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 157/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-157-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-157-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 38/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-38-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-38-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 38/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-38-02-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-38-02-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 9/05 AS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-9-05-as-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-9-05-as-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 1/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-1-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-1-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 21/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-21-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-21-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 RJ 42/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-rj-42-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-rj-42-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 RJ 11/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-rj-11-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-rj-11-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 49/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-49-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-49-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 3/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-3-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:03:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:03:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-3-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 29/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-29-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:55:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:55:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-29-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a67413597f41bdd1d3e8e435b2ca5291 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e546501011ea4437e8c5bea1bf4cb97a:0.78107900 1751742655 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.