| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 U 11/02 | 12.06.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 120/02 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 236/98 | 16.07.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 119/01 | 30.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 38 AY 13/05 ER | 14.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 23. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AL 981/01 | 05.02.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 71/02 | 29.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 2/98 | 15.06.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 116/00 | 23.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 54/99 | 06.12.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 24/02 | 18.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 P 51/98 | 02.11.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 P 1/01 | 15.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 KR 4/99 | 08.11.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 84/01 | 24.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 RA 754/01 ZV | 12.03.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 119/02 | 12.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 9 RA 33/03 | 06.06.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 302/03 | 21.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 U 26/96 | 24.06.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 108/99 | 11.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AS 175/05 ER | 18.05.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 19. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 38/05 ER | 03.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 19. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 7 KN 352/03 | 05.04.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KN 88/04 | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 5 BL 3/03 | 16.03.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 BL 1/04 | 19.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 6 AL 449/02 | 20.11.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AL 83/04 | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 2 SB 100 /00 | 21.08.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SB 67/01 | 30.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 12 RJ 356/02 | 17.03.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 111/04 | 31.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 639/99 | 25.01.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 68/01 | 24.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 25/05 ER | 11.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 12/05 ER | 17.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 B 11/05 AS ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 Al 93/97 | 27.11.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 51/98 | 25.07.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 90/00 R | 19.12.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 KA 4541/00 | 02.03.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 172/01 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 AL 1282/04 | 26.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 3835/04 | 03.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 AL 2382/99 | 10.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 4587/00 | 18.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Mai 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3292 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3292 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3292 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 120/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-120-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-120-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 119/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-119-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-119-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 AY 13/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ay-13-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ay-13-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 71/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-71-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-71-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 116/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-116-00-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-116-00-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 24/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-24-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-24-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 1/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-1-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-1-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 84/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-84-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-84-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 119/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-119-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-119-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 302/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-302-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-302-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 108/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-108-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-108-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 175/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-175-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-175-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 38/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-38-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-38-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KN 88/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kn-88-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kn-88-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BL 1/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-bl-1-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-bl-1-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 83/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-83-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-83-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 67/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-67-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-67-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 111/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-111-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-111-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 68/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-68-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-68-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 25/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-25-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-25-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 12/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-12-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-12-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 51/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-51-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:02:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:02:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-51-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 172/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-172-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-172-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 3835/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-3835-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:41:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:41:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-3835-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 4587/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-4587-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-4587-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 120/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-120-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-120-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 37097c2a78b2369aa73518c088fc255b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:528e36e6ea37410e51bb06faab4aabd2:0.76263900 1751482130 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.