| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 KR 994/02 | 13.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1315/04 | 15.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 SO 247/04 ER | 28.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 970/05 ER-B | 07.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 U 4665/95 | 29.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 217/02 | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3808/04 | 10.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 63/05 | 08.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 6 EG 17/01 | 21.11.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 4/03 | 10.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 5/03 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Mai 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 14 RA 573/02 | 18.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RA 168/04 | 01.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 4 AL 341/00 | 19.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 AL 30/03 | 13.04.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 2 AL 257/01 | 12.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 167/02 | 04.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 5 KR 76/99 | 19.09.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 78/01 | 25.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 28/02 R | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Mai 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 12.11.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 64/02 R | 28.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | 27.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 50/03 R | 28.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 24.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 42/02 R | 28.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 3/03 R | 28.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 VJ 2/95 | 29.05.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VJ 6/00 | 18.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 56/04 A | 15.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 283/04 | 13.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 28/98 | 04.05.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 261/00 | 12.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 1257/01 A | 19.06.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 621/02 | 17.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 RA 4/00 | 17.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 4244/02 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 74/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 12 RA 401/00 | 15.05.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 4236/02 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 P 10/02 | 30.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 P 29/04 | 12.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 4 KN 32/01 | 28.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 KN 1/03 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KA 228/02 | 15.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 3/04 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AL 44/00 | 30.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 322/02 | 24.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 AL 500/99 | 09.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 230/04 | 24.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 82/03 | 21.12.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. Mai 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3296 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3296 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3296 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1315/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1315-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1315-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 970/05 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-970-05-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-970-05-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 U 217/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-u-217-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-u-217-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 63/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-63-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-63-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RA 168/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-ra-168-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-ra-168-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 AL 30/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-al-30-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-al-30-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 167/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-167-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-167-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 28/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-28-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-28-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 64/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-64-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-64-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 50/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-50-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-50-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 42/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-42-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-42-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VJ 6/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vj-6-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vj-6-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 283/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-283-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-283-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 261/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-261-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-261-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 621/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-621-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-621-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 4244/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-4244-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-4244-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 4236/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-4236-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-4236-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 P 29/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-p-29-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-p-29-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 KN 1/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-kn-1-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-kn-1-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 3/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-3-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-3-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 322/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-322-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:01:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:01:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-322-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 230/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-230-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-230-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140459 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 82/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-82-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-82-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1315/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1315-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1315-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 27e3fd66fcc31def4507fcd96922d21f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:558e5516c2ac94ed324de9f958a93ce5:0.75495800 1751394024 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.