| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 82/03 | 21.12.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 55/00 | 24.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 21 AR 8/05 | 07.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 7/05 ER | 08.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 17/05 ER | 20.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AS 17/05 ER | 20.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. Mai 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 13 RA 1720/01 | 24.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RA 12/03 | 17.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Mai 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 RJ 540/98 | 21.01.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 83/03 | 31.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 P 41/03 | 12.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 (3) P 41/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 82/05 ER | 31.03.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 B 11/05 AS ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 29. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 184/02 | 22.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 29. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 RJ 328/03 | 27.04.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 29. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 22.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 17/04 R | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 57/98 | 14.02.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 12/01 | 01.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 12/03 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 6 KR 202/99 | 27.08.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/03 R | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 RA 2470/97 | 11.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 1566/00 | 25.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 3/03 R | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 KR 118/97 | 04.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 22/99 | 14.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 16/03 R | 24.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 KR 2380/99 | 16.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 4475/00 | 12.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 6/03 R | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 5 KR 49/00 | 10.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 112/01 | 12.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/03 R | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 U 1575/00 | 07.09.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 5003/01 | 17.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 24/03 R | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 P 33/01 | 31.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 28. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 22 AS 22/05 ER | 05.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 28. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 4 AS 31/05 ER | 20.04.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 28. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 12 AL 17/03 | 02.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 152/04 | 28.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 5 AL 781/98 | 05.12.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 57/01 | 25.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. April 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3297 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3297 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3297 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 82/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-82-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-82-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 55/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-55-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-55-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AR 8/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-ar-8-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-ar-8-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 7/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-7-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-7-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133121 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 17/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-17-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-17-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 17/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-17-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-17-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RA 12/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ra-12-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ra-12-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 83/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-83-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-83-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 P 41/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-p-41-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-p-41-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 82/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-82-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-82-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 184/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-184-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-184-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RJ 328/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-rj-328-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-rj-328-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 17/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-17-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-17-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 12/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-12-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-12-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 16/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-16-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:10:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:10:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-16-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 6/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-6-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-6-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83119 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 24/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-24-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-24-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 33/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-33-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-33-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 22/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-22-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-22-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 31/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-31-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-31-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 152/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-152-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-152-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 57/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-57-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-57-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-05-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-05-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 82/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-82-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-82-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 01831fd75b1ebb6ddd75d94cdf8e7696 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:55b40f0d14c11b99b9da5c0ea186ec8b:0.67685000 1751366758 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.