| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 2244/03 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 11/05 KR | 27.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 260/02 | 21.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 99/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 1 KA 628/04 ER | 10.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 213/04 KA-Er | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 2 AL 121/02 | 04.05.2004 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 59/04 | 14.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 5 KR 102/00 | 23.01.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 40/03 | 15.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 16 RJ 51/01 | 05.03.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 RJ 117/03 | 08.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 8 KR 263/01 | 17.12.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 122/04 | 15.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 KR 94/01 | 28.10.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 105/03 | 15.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 3 RJ 45/01 | 13.05.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 RJ 71/03 | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 KR 81/01 | 09.01.2003 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 84/03 | 15.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 SB 455/04 | 19.04.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 19. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 6 AS 30/05 ER | 21.02.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 19. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 6 AS 70/05 ER | 08.03.2005 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 19. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 AL 544/03 | 26.08.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 319/03 | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 24 AL 441/02 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 133/03 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RA 955/04 | 16.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 18. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 1140/03 | 10.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 18. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 525/01 | 23.05.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. April 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 V 21/99 | 10.07.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 V 16/02 | 18.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 399/00 | 15.01.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 66/03 | 12.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 97/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 KA 1491/03 | 20.01.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 221/04 | 22.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AL 821/02 | 18.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 168/04 | 03.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 57/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 12 AL 446/02 | 24.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AL 57/03 | 04.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 3 P 35/97 | 15.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 P 4/00 | 09.03.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. April 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 9 RA 686/99 | 11.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RA 314/02 | 22.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. April 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3299 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3299 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3299 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 11/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-11-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-11-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 260/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-260-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-260-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 213/04 KA-Er [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-213-04-ka-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-213-04-ka-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 59/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-59-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-59-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 40/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-40-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-40-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 RJ 117/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-rj-117-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-rj-117-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 122/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-122-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-122-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 105/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-105-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-105-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 RJ 71/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-rj-71-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-rj-71-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 84/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-84-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-84-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SB 455/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-sb-455-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-sb-455-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 30/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-30-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-30-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 70/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-70-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-70-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 319/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-319-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-319-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 133/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-133-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-133-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 RA 955/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-ra-955-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-ra-955-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 1140/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-1140-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-1140-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 525/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-525-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-525-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 V 16/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-v-16-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-v-16-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 66/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-66-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-66-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 221/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-221-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-221-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 112016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 168/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-168-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 16:00:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 15:00:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-168-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AL 57/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-al-57-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-al-57-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 P 4/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-p-4-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-p-4-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RA 314/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-ra-314-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-ra-314-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-04-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-04-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 11/05 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-11-05-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-11-05-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a9aade0fb067b99a8a2f15ecc8d2cd83 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d4a78e60619c0f6cddc8215ea0367534:0.58645500 1751339781 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.