| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 AS 3407/20 | 23.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1849/21 | 11.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 SO 132/23 | 21.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 91/24 B | 27.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 328/19 | 05.05.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 117/20 | 31.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/24 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 5. August 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 AS 870/20 | 05.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1363/22 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 SO 3140/23 ER | 05.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 734/24 ER-B | 30.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 BA 3695/20 | 13.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 205/24 | 29.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 14 R 2838/20 | 28.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 12/24 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 580/21 | 26.07.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 357/23 | 17.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 19 U 46/16 | 06.08.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 2. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 19 U 96/23 | 15.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 2. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 87/24 ER | 26.03.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 116/24 B ER | 06.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 141 R 1198/19 | 10.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 245/23 | 03.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 AY 18/24 ER | 30.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 1. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 AY 15/24 ER | 30.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 1. August 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 110/23 ER | 16.02.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 88/24 B ER | 07.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 1. August 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 14 BA 24/19 | 23.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 72/22 | 19.06.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. August 2024 | ||
| S 22 AS 839/22 | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 2146/22 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 SO 2662/22 | 13.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1992/23 | 20.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 2969/17 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2244/20 | 28.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 R 236/20 | 21.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 2487/22 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 271/20 | 14.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 969/23 | 05.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 21 R 430/23 ER | 20.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 31. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 177/17 | 26.11.2020 | L 3 R 47/21 | 10.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. Juli 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 580/21 (verbunden mit S 1 AS 174/22) | 26.07.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 357/23 | 17.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 KR 95/21 | 09.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 275/22 | 22.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 30. Juli 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 33 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 33 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 33 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1849/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1849-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1849-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 91/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-91-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-91-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 117/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-117-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-117-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1363/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1363-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1363-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 734/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-734-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-734-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 205/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-205-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-205-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 12/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-12-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-12-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 580/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-580-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-580-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 46/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-46-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-46-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 96/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-96-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-96-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 116/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-116-24-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-116-24-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 245/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-245-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-245-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 18/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-18-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-18-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 15/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-15-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-15-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 110/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-110-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-110-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 72/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-72-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-72-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 2146/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-2146-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-2146-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1992/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1992-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1992-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2244/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2244-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2244-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 2487/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-2487-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-2487-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 969/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-969-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-969-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 R 430/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-r-430-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-r-430-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 47/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-47-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-47-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 357/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-357-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-357-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 95/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-95-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-95-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1849/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1849-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1849-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 094519499f32d4bc73247a7ba2f5bfa4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fe37e597b8d4890904a4d31f2c16ea5e:0.90892500 1745175831 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.