| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 2 RJ 78/01 A | 19.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 345/03 | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 1147/98 A | 03.12.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 275/03 | 21.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 RJ 300/03 | 23.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 259/04 | 17.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 2 RJ 1468/02 A | 17.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 394/04 | 18.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 RJ 1486/02 A | 24.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 217/04 | 18.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 716/01 | 29.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 282/03 | 11.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 KA 930/01 | 14.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 110/02 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 RA 9/04 | 24.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 23. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 69/04 | 12.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 23. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 (4) AL 203/02 | 23.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 156/03 | 10.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 30/04 R | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 14 KA 221/99 | 19.09.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KA 4/02 | 05.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 30/03 R | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. März 2005 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 2/03 NV | 17.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/04 R | 24.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 86 KR 2117/00 | 14.02.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 23/03 R | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 39 P 30/98 | 27.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 P 143/00 | 29.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 4/02 R | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 369/03 | 22.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 6 AL 58/02 | 30.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 27.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 17.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 56/04 R | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| 02.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 22/04 R | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | 08.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 28.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 47/04 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | 20.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 32/04 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 18.11.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 31/04 R | 10.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 31.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 21/04 R | 20.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | 11.04.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 10/03 R | 07.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 27/02 | 12.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 15/04 | 22.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 185/01 | 20.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 69/03 | 25.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3304 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 345/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-345-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-345-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 275/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-275-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-275-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 259/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-259-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-259-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 394/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-394-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-394-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 217/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-217-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-217-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 282/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-282-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-282-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 110/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-110-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-110-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 RA 9/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ra-9-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ra-9-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 69/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-69-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-69-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 30/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-30-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-30-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 30/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-30-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-30-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 10/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-10-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-10-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 23/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-23-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-23-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 4/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-4-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-4-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 369/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-369-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-369-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AL 58/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-al-58-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-al-58-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 56/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-56-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-56-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 22/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-22-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-22-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 47/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-47-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-47-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 32/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-32-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-32-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 31/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-31-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-31-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 21/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-21-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-21-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 10/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-10-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-10-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 15/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-15-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-15-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 69/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-69-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:54:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:54:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-69-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 345/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-345-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-345-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 71e475ad28fd55989d42958afc5ce216 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:96da27bfb24209d7bdf68951c6b9c9d0:0.39483200 1751278417 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.