| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 30.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 AL 2/04 R | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 31.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 33/04 R | 20.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 5 KR 85/98 | 15.12.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 25/01 | 10.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 62/04 B | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 85 KR 3748/00*82 | 31.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 44/02 | 25.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 85 KR 1989/01 | 23.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 31/02 | 04.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 263/99 | 12.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 305/01 | 04.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 43 SB 2702/00 | 09.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 53/03 | 28.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 48 SB 767/03*45 | 23.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 114/03 | 14.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 4081/02 | 30.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 46/03 | 22.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 130/98 | 09.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 51/00 | 03.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 2931/04 ER | 27.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 249/04 KR ER | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 RJ 452/96 | 04.11.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 RJ 552/99 | 27.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 2/05 AR | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 RJ 1/04 | 23.06.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 488/04 | 21.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 RJ 1115/01 | 25.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 324/03 | 08.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 RJ 581/99 | 05.12.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 RJ 8/02 | 22.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 RA 1082/02 | 25.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 210/03 | 21.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 RJ 177/99 | 25.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 115/03 | 21.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 6 KG 138/96 | 18.01.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KG 15/01 | 23.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 AL 3/02 | 18.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 18/04 | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11a AL 33/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 P 89/00 | 25.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 P 42/01 | 15.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 6/03 R | 22.07.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| 16.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 9/03 R | 26.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | |||
| Sozialgericht Köln | 07.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 09.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 22/03 R | 20.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 5 V 19/00 | 08.08.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 V 60/01 | 18.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 3/03 R | 11.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 37 AL 257/02 | 18.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 202/03 | 07.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 16/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 1690/00 | 28.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2131/01 | 27.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/03 R | 22.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3307 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 AL 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-al-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-al-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 33/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-33-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-33-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 62/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-62-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-62-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 85 KR 3748/00*82 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-85-kr-3748-0082 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-85-kr-3748-0082/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 31/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-31-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:53:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:53:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-31-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 305/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-305-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:53:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:53:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-305-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 53/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-53-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:53:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:53:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-53-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 114/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-114-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:53:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:53:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-114-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 46/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-46-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:53:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:53:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-46-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 51/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-51-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-51-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 249/04 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-249-04-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-249-04-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 RJ 552/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-rj-552-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-rj-552-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 488/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-488-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-488-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 RJ 324/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-rj-324-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-rj-324-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 RJ 8/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-rj-8-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-rj-8-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 210/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-210-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-210-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 115/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-115-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-115-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KG 15/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kg-15-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kg-15-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 18/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-18-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-18-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 P 42/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-p-42-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:50:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:50:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-p-42-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 9/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-9-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-9-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 22/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-22-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-22-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 16/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-16-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-16-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 AL 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-al-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:09:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:09:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-al-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 856c286e636bbb7af2f78008381c81fd [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9148d63502df16262950d87ae0aed3ab:0.64737600 1751220692 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.