| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 EG 11/00 | 10.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 EG 15/02 | 24.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 2/04 R | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 Ka 313/01 | 31.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 KA 10/01 | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 37/03 R | 08.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 KR 221/00 | 27.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 93/01 | 11.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 22/02 R | 25.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 AL 437/00 | 24.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 111/01 | 07.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 68/03 R | 02.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 3 KR 283/99 | 04.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 69/02 | 08.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 20/03 R | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 P 89/00 | 25.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 P 42/01 | 15.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 6/03 R | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 6 AL 538/02 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 B 73/03 AL-PKH | 02.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 SB 362/04 | 25.02.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 5. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 373/04 | 07.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 5. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 1174/04 | 03.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 5. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 13 VS 6/00 | 29.01.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 VS 1/02 | 27.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 37 KR 132/01 | 10.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 18/03 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 11 LW 5/01 | 08.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 LW 1/02 | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 129/02 | 30.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 KA 11/03 | 09.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 49/01 | 21.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 KA 19/03 | 09.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 RJ 79/04 | 25.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 3. März 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 KA 5017/00 | 02.08.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 KA 522/01 | 29.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 5 RA 35/01 | 17.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 14/03 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 6 RA 530/02 | 30.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RA 90/04 | 08.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 72/04 | 06.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 47/04 | 25.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 177/01 | 20.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KR 6/04 | 25.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 14 RA 841/03 | 21.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 RA 304/04 | 08.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 880/99 | 30.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 23/02 | 03.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 KR 540/01 | 27.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 94/04 | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 2. März 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 39 RJ 1001/03 | 09.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 60/04 | 16.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 2. März 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3308 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 37/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-37-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-37-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83032 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 22/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-22-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-22-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 68/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-68-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-68-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83004 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 20/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-20-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-20-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 6/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-6-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-6-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 73/03 AL-PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-73-03-al-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-73-03-al-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SB 362/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-sb-362-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-sb-362-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 373/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-373-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-373-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 1174/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-1174-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-1174-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VS 1/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vs-1-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vs-1-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 18/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-18-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-18-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 LW 1/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-lw-1-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:42:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:42:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-lw-1-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KA 11/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ka-11-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ka-11-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KA 19/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ka-19-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ka-19-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 RJ 79/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-rj-79-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-rj-79-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 522/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-522-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-522-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 14/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-14-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-14-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RA 90/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-ra-90-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-ra-90-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 47/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-47-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-47-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KR 6/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-kr-6-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-kr-6-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 RA 304/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-ra-304-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-ra-304-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 23/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-23-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-23-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 94/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-94-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-94-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 60/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-60-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-60-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 735853ccf87e5c66412e9aba342cdb4d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:63884804feba4146409632e85c822e14:0.44819000 1751219812 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.