| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 RJ 243/03 | 23.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RJ 81/04 | 09.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 22. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 212/04 | 11.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. Februar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 91/04 | 19.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AL 23/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 21 KR 144/89 | 20.11.1989 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Februar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 KN 58/04 KR | 10.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 B 23/04 KN KR NZB | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 22. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 SO 28/05 ER | 16.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. Februar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 13 V 1241/01 | 28.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 V 721/02 | 07.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 3/02 R | 16.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Februar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 1748/02 | 18.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 116/04 | 09.02.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 P 1476/99 ER | 02.12.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 P 74/00 ER | 21.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 21.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 2/04 R | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Februar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 684/99 | 30.03.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 107/01 | 29.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 23/04 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Februar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 20 AL 124/97 | 01.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 147/01 | 24.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 78/03 R | 02.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Februar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 26 RJ 1744/01 | 29.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RJ 7/02 | 22.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 1551/03 | 02.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 94/04 | 15.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1891/01 | 11.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 103/02 | 15.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2080/02 | 23.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 7/04 KR | 30.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 2337/03 ER 04 | 16.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 88/04 KR ER | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1100/04 ER | 13.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 70/04 KR ER | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 108/99*71 | 08.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 32/01 | 11.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1133/04 ER*75 | 29.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 B 64/04 KR | 17.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 106/02 | 30.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 U 79/03 | 09.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 576/02 | 25.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 U 77/03 | 18.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 30/99 KZA | 22.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 64/01 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 7/98 KZA | 24.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 22/01 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Februar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 KR 544/02 | 23.11.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 6/05 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Februar 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3311 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 81/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-81-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-81-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SB 212/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-sb-212-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-sb-212-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 91/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-91-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-91-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 144/89 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-144-89 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-144-89/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KN 58/04 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-kn-58-04-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-kn-58-04-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 28/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-28-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-28-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 3/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-3-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-3-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151558 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 116/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-116-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-116-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 P 74/00 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-p-74-00-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-p-74-00-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 23/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-23-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-23-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 78/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-78-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-78-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 7/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-7-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-7-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 94/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-94-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-94-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 103/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-103-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-103-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 7/04 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-7-04-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-7-04-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 88/04 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-88-04-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-88-04-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 70/04 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-70-04-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-70-04-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 32/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-32-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-32-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 B 64/04 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-b-64-04-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-b-64-04-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 U 79/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-u-79-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-u-79-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 U 77/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-u-77-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-u-77-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 64/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-64-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:52:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:52:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-64-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 22/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-22-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-22-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 KR 544/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-kr-544-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-kr-544-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 81/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-81-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-81-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 312e213480b8b1f9615a7fa23fb7e63a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a680e8f7394c557340fcc0edbb0f35c1:0.11578100 1751162574 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.