| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 14 P 29/02 | 02.04.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 P 31/04 | 24.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 110/03 | 02.12.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 296/03 | 11.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 111/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 3 KR 509/01 | 16.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 226/02 | 28.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 5 AL 1771/00 | 30.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 412/03 | 15.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 AL 155/03 | 06.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 402/03 | 15.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 423/00 | 16.12.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 B 258/04 U PKH | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 2 SB 1011/01 | 23.03.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 132/04 ER | 23.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 SB 64/00 | 17.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 117/02 | 19.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 75/97 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 348/99 | 27.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 379/02 | 06.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 11/04 | 25.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 U 5067/00 | 13.03.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 153/01 | 30.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 254/04 B | 10.01.2005 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 13 RA 1051/02 | 29.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 194/04 | 29.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 6 AL 206/00 | 12.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 225/00 | 12.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 14 RJ 8/00 | 19.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 14/03 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 08.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 43/03 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 163/04 | 30.08.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 23/04 R | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 KR 28/02 | 11.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 234/02 | 11.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 19/03 R | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 16 RJ 351/00 | 06.03.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 RJ 52/02 | 16.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 13/04 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 (3) RJ 163/98 | 30.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RJ 90/0 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 59/03 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 18 EG 55/01 | 07.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 EG 9/03 | 19.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/04 R | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 7 U 111/98 | 31.01.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 35/02 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 67/03 | 24.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 50/04 | 19.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 4 J 1421/96 | 12.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 28/99 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 39 RJ 1297/00 | 10.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RJ 67/02 | 07.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 81/04 | 10.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. Januar 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3317 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 P 31/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-p-31-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-p-31-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 296/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-296-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-296-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 226/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-226-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-226-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 412/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-412-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-412-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 402/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-402-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-402-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 B 258/04 U PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-b-258-04-u-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-b-258-04-u-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 132/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-132-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-132-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 117/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-117-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-117-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 348/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-348-99-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-348-99-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 U 11/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-u-11-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-u-11-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 153/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-153-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-153-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 194/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-194-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-194-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 225/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-225-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-225-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 14/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-14-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-14-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 43/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-43-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-43-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 23/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-23-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-23-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 19/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-19-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-19-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 13/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-13-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-13-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 59/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-59-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-59-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 35/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-35-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-35-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 50/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-50-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-50-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 28/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-28-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-28-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 67/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-67-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-67-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 81/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-81-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-81-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 P 31/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-p-31-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-p-31-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9ade90d2ef5945f8ab9bcab61b9f501e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c3d0e78c3b21dca0835b50e5e20beeda:0.62405800 1751081976 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.