| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 AL 390/99 | 14.11.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 42/02 | 12.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 63/02 | 16.04.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 27. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 AL 528/01 | 26.06.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 282/03 | 18.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 AL 908/02 | 04.02.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AL 88/04 | 18.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 34 AL 1148/97 | 14.09.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 42/01 | 15.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 4/05 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 372/00 | 14.01.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 39/02 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 20 AL 1279/01 | 15.12.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 16/04 | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 KR 1062/04 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 2/04 | 08.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 (11) KR 107/03 | 25.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 26. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 241/98 | 08.12.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 12/01 | 03.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 12 AL 939/99 | 10.02.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 432/00 | 09.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 KA 1872/98 | 01.12.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 KA 47/00 | 27.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 6 KN 223/01 P | 09.04.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KN 502/02 P | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 6 KN 772/01 | 18.03.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KN 372/03 | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 32 KA 372/99 | 13.09.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 146/00 | 24.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 11/02 R | 05.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 RA 811/02 ZV | 01.07.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 278/03 | 24.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 37/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 1158/04 | 19.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 24. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 60/03 | 28.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 24. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 540/04 | 16.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 24. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 U 54/00 | 27.06.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 86/01 | 14.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 684/99 | 30.03.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 107/01 | 29.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 23/04 R | 07.10.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 608/04 | 05.01.2005 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RJ 170/04 | 15.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 142/98 | 14.10.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 44/02 | 18.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3318 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AL 390/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-al-390-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-al-390-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 63/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-63-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-63-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 282/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-282-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-282-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 88/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-88-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-88-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 42/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-42-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-42-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 39/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-39-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:55:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:55:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-39-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 16/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-16-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-16-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 2/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-2-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-2-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 (11) KR 107/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-11-kr-107-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-11-kr-107-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 12/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-12-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-12-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AL 432/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-al-432-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:09:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:09:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-al-432-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 47/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-47-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-47-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KN 502/02 P [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kn-502-02-p [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kn-502-02-p/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KN 372/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kn-372-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kn-372-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81870 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 11/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-11-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:34:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:34:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-11-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 278/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-278-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-278-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 1158/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-1158-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-1158-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 60/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-60-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-60-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 540/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-540-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-540-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 86/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-86-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-86-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 107/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-107-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-107-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 608/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-608-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-608-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RJ 170/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-rj-170-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-rj-170-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 142/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-142-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-142-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 44/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-44-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-44-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AL 390/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-al-390-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-al-390-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3dee53e9acebfa8b2af392c6d790ff92 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e8c08e986044f2a9d35064a0634426f9:0.86902900 1751080672 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.