| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 254/04 | 10.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 1229/04 | 15.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AL 1311/03 | 28.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 318/03 | 13.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 21. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 17 RA 1616/98 | 27.05.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 RA 627/03 | 19.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 2 RJ 1006/00 | 25.01.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 RJ 247/01 | 24.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 RJ 2886/97 | 26.08.2002 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 B 93/02 RJ | 07.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 RJ 1313/99 | 17.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 38/02 | 17.01.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 KR 379/01 | 04.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 KR 229/00 | 18.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 59/01 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/02 R | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 25/98 | 16.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 U 37/03 | 07.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 19. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 1122/98 | 09.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 20/00 | 25.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 AL 805/93 | 30.10.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 375/98 | 28.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 176/99 | 25.10.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 138/00 | 02.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 AL 1376/96 | 23.03.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 143/99 | 28.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 116/03 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 2014/99 | 27.01.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 27/00 | 08.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 32/03 R | 08.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2005 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 10 RA 548/00 | 20.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 RA 42/03 | 17.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 18. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 102/02 | 04.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 19/04 | 14.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 26/00 | 29.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 KR 48/03 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 13 RJ 445/00 | 04.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 46/03 | 30.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2005 | |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 6 KR 121/04 | 29.06.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 15/04 R | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 135/04 | 30.08.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/04 R | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 121/04 | 30.08.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 26/04 R | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 108/03 | 15.03.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 40/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 2 RJ 20190/95 | 22.07.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 RJ 227/02 | 05.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 39/03 R | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2005 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3319 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 82950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 254/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-254-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-254-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 1229/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-1229-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-1229-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AL 1311/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-al-1311-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-al-1311-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 318/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-318-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-318-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RA 627/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ra-627-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ra-627-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RJ 247/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-rj-247-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-rj-247-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 119050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 B 93/02 RJ [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-b-93-02-rj [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-b-93-02-rj/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 38/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-38-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-38-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 379/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-379-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-379-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 229/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-229-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-229-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 37/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-37-03-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-37-03-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 20/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-20-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:42:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:42:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-20-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 375/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-375-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:26:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:26:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-375-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 138/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-138-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:25:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:25:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-138-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 143/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-143-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:19:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:19:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-143-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 32/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-32-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-32-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RA 42/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ra-42-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ra-42-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 19/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-19-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-19-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 48/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-48-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-48-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 46/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-46-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-46-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 15/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-15-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-15-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 26/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-26-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-26-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 40/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-40-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-40-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 39/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-39-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-39-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 254/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-254-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-254-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7b9eab7411d940cbe76e2d55a88b244e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c92f63ba504781a8d5e595d821968178:0.07282900 1751054458 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.