| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 49/04 | 22.07.2004 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 21/04 R | 02.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Januar 2005 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 VG 21/02 | 05.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 2/04 | 27.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 V 8/99 | 28.06.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 V 36/01 | 17.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 2 SB 654/01 | 10.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 146/03 | 17.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 14 RJ 466/02 | 14.08.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 596/03 | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 3/01 | 28.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 216/03 | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 23/02 A | 26.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 125/03 | 21.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 RA 910/01 | 15.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RA 103/03 | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 257/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 283/02 | 28.08.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 292/03 | 30.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 273/02 | 20.03.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 124/02 | 21.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 37 AL 1710/97 | 20.09.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 329/00 | 29.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 277/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 RA 755/99-14 | 25.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 77/03 | 20.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 Ka 5/99 | 29.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 202/00 | 15.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 27/03 R | 08.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 7 U 164/99 | 08.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 U 98/02 | 20.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 45/03 R | 07.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 13 RJ 650/99 | 09.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 RJ 51/02 | 25.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 3/04 R | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 RJ 466/99 | 22.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 RJ 68/01 | 16.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 10/03 R | 05.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 KR 352/03 | 18.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 4/04 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 KR 1724/02 | 18.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 9/04 | 15.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 37 KE 387/01 | 15.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 10/03 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 2238/02 | 18.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 96/04 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 AL 1465/01 | 27.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 AL 78/02 | 24.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 299/98 | 16.03.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 41/00 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 739/98 | 09.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 5/02 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| S 7 RJ 771/97 A | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 538/02 KO | 09.12.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 RA 378/03 | 17.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 264/03 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3323 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3323 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3323 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 21/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-21-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-21-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 2/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-2-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-2-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 V 36/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-v-36-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-v-36-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 146/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-146-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-146-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 596/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-596-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-596-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 216/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-216-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-216-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 125/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-125-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-125-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RA 103/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-ra-103-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-ra-103-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111569 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 292/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-292-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-292-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111567 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 124/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-124-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-124-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111565 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 329/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-329-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-329-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 77/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-77-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-77-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 27/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-27-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-27-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 45/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-45-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-45-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 3/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-3-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-3-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 10/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-10-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-10-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 4/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-4-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-4-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 9/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-9-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-9-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 10/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-10-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-10-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 96/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-96-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-96-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 78/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-78-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-78-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 41/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-41-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-41-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 5/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-5-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-5-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 538/02 KO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-538-02-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-538-02-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 264/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-264-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-264-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2005-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2005-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 21/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-21-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-21-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fcf7be25f95792e9b0873dc1cf538928 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c9c05b82efd42922b0f41105bc6e9f35:0.44994800 1750995797 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.