| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 RA 850/03 | 17.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 94/04 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 RA 345/03 | 22.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 230/03 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 27/01 | 20.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 25/03 | 20.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 74/00 | 17.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 45/03 | 03.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 4 RA 115/02 | 07.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 270/03 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 36 AL 1454/00 | 12.06.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 442/02 | 14.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 5/04 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 61/00 | 01.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 KA 4/01 | 11.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 1097/01 | 24.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 43/04 | 10.11.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 871/02 | 14.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 46/03 | 14.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 13 AL 5/99 | 23.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 23. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 35/04 | 07.10.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 SB 166/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 18 KR 61/98 | 23.10.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 374/01 | 03.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 97/02 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 AL 52/03 | 17.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 22. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 26.06.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 05.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 35/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 01.07.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 37/04 R | 26.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 LW 188/97 | 25.10.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 60/99 | 24.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 13/02 R | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 321/99 | 24.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 62/03 | 13.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 35/02 | 04.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 54/03 | 13.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 227/01 | 06.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 388/02 | 13.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 RJ 905/02 | 28.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 520/03 | 23.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 RJ 470/98 | 13.01.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 476/00 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 485/04 A | 24.10.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 306/02 | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 RJ 266/03 A | 07.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 150/04 | 19.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 282/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 RA 490/03 | 06.05.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 RA 127/04 | 20.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3324 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 94/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-94-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-94-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 230/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-230-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-230-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 25/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-25-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-25-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 45/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-45-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-45-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 270/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-270-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-270-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 5/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-5-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:08:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:08:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-5-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KA 4/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ka-4-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ka-4-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 43/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-43-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-43-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 46/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-46-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-46-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AL 5/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-al-5-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-al-5-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SB 35/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-sb-35-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:23:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:23:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-sb-35-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 61/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-61-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-61-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 374/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-374-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-374-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 52/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-52-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-52-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 35/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-35-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-35-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 37/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-37-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-37-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 13/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-13-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-13-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 62/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-62-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-62-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 54/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-54-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-54-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 388/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-388-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-388-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 520/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-520-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-520-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 RJ 476/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-rj-476-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-rj-476-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 306/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-306-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-306-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 150/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-150-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-150-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 RA 127/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-ra-127-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:53:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:53:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-ra-127-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 94/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-94-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-94-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fbc3bcd6943b0b5f2b829663c7bfa623 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:daa9cf3608869a2b88b941af1c531460:0.99089700 1750967062 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.