| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 AL 688/01 | 18.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 393/02 | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 AL 301/01 | 29.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 350/03 | 24.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 AL 223/01 | 16.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 290/03 | 17.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 35 AL 523/00 | 10.01.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 78/03 | 20.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 AL 411/97 | 07.12.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 73/01 | 13.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 7 AL 607/99 | 22.01.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 51/03 | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 7 AL 491/98 | 06.12.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 32/01 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 288/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 1069/01 | 18.12.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 83/02 | 07.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 SB 340/02 | 09.12.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 10. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 227/02 | 30.11.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 10. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 15 KA 374/03 | 28.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 5005/03 Z | 29.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 KA 312/99 | 25.06.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 138/02 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 9. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 246/02 | 08.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 9. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 139/02 | 08.09.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 9. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 339/01 | 29.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 U 69/03 | 26.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RA 701/01 | 30.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 87/03 | 23.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 275/98 | 25.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 650/01 | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 7 RA 748/02 | 07.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 204/03 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 3101/99 | 30.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 4754/00 | 17.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2004 | |
| Privat: Sozialgericht Stendal | S 10 U 67/99 | 09.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 95/00 | 05.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/03 R | 22.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 134/97 | 18.08.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 22/99 | 01.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 82/03 R | 09.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 18.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 16.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 21/03 R | 21.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 KR 62/9 | 21.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 119/01 | 06.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 12/04 R | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 KR 5596/98 | 29.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2977/0 | 28.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/03 R | 22.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3328 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 393/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-393-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-393-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 350/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-350-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-350-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 290/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-290-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-290-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 78/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-78-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-78-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 73/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-73-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-73-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 51/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-51-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-51-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 32/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-32-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-32-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 83/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-83-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-83-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140525 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SB 340/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sb-340-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sb-340-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 227/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-227-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-227-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KA 374/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-ka-374-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-ka-374-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 5005/03 Z [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-5005-03-z [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-5005-03-z/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 45 KA 312/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-45-ka-312-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-45-ka-312-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 246/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-246-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-246-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 139/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-139-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-139-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 U 69/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-u-69-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-u-69-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99751 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 87/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-87-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-87-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 275/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-275-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-275-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 204/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-204-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-204-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 U 4754/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-u-4754-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:39:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:39:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-u-4754-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 11/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-11-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-11-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 82/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-82-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-82-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 21/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-21-03-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-21-03-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 12/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-12-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-12-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 393/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-393-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-393-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0d9b13637033cbbe1d335c71dacb0a05 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:41e7ad03f5e44576cc4384744b9c0bb2:0.05140100 1750909635 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.