Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 5 AS 4421/11 | 17.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 611/16 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 266/20 B | 30.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 438/13 | 17.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 667/14 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 63/20 B | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 3223/18 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1992/19 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 294/20 B | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SO 3530/17 | 10.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 3. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 300/10 | 19.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 3. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 68 KR 1356/18 | 10.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 3. Dezember 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 24 AS 232/15 | 18.03.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 95/16 | 23.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 SF 73/12 E | 28.01.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 301/20 B E | 24.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 4 SF 80/19 E | 22.11.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 187/19 B E | 20.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 U 141/15 | 05.04.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 U 176/17 | 21.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 347/18 | 06.12.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 14/20 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 15 KR 1017/20 ER | 12.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 251/20 B ER | 01.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 519/13 | 29.06.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 502/17 | 16.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 17 AS 264/20 | 03.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 1162/20 NZB | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 33 AS 2232/17 | 15.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 962/18 | 06.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 227/12 | 27.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 19/16 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 227/12 | 27.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 19/16 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 116 AS 11041/12 | 22.01.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 724/15 | 15.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 37/19 R | 03.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 96 AS 27946/14 | 09.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 1650/16 | 15.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 40/19 R | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 1132/16 | 25.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 349/18 | 17.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 188/20 B | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Aurich | S 12 P 16/16 | 15.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 P 47/17 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 1/20 R | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2020 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 48 KR 1151/15 | 28.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 65/19 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 181/17 | 16.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 26/20 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 278/17 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 19/19 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Dezember 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 2 R 6717/16 | 22.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 3329/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 333 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 333 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 333 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 611/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-611-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-611-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 667/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-667-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-667-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1992/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1992-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1992-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 3530/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-3530-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-3530-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 300/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-300-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-300-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 68 KR 1356/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-68-kr-1356-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-68-kr-1356-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 95/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-95-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-95-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 301/20 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-301-20-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-301-20-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 187/19 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-187-19-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-187-19-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 U 176/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-u-176-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-u-176-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 251/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-251-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-251-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 502/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-502-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-502-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 1162/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-1162-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-1162-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 962/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-962-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-962-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 19/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-19-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-19-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 19/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-19-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-19-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 724/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-724-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:06:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:06:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-724-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87525 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 40/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-40-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-40-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 188/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-188-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-188-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:03:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:03:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 65/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-65-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-65-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 26/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-26-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:06:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:06:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-26-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 3329/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-3329-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:21:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:21:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-3329-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 611/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-611-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-611-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7d0de4012fb13105dd4a13d6f9fc204a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:17d6e6ac529db54a8f13f44a6b01e1c4:0.02757300 1751320749 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.