| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RA 5803/01 | 30.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 78/03 | 26.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 RA 3740/98 | 26.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 14/00 W 01 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 KA 220/03 | 17.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 2. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 438/02 | 06.11.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 366/03 | 11.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 RJ 660/00 A | 09.11.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 725/01 | 13.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 RJ 393/01 | 30.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 686/03 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 6 RJ 511/01 | 14.08.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 656/02 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| S 7 RJ 964/99 A | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RJ 652/01 | 09.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 248/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 RJ 1214/02 A | 12.08.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 620/03 | 07.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 RJ 608/98 | 03.07.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RJ 602/01 | 09.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 474/02 A | 30.07.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 538/03 | 10.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 RJ 1450/02 A | 27.05.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 347/03 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 RJ 124/02 | 04.04.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 286/03 | 16.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 668/03 A | 22.10.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 127/04 | 12.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 313/03 A | 29.01.2004 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 117/04 | 12.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 RJ 232/00 | 27.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 238/03 | 27.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 6 RJ 1923/98 | 22.02.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 325/01 | 13.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 208/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | 26.07.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 18/02 R | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |||
| 08.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 4/03 R | 23.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 09.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 2/04 R | 07.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 3 P 164/01 | 11.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 P 7/03 | 06.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 1/04 R | 25.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 7 AL 69/01 | 04.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AL 373/02 | 27.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 88/03 R | 02.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 15 KN 55/02 | 13.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 KN 27/03 | 26.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 10/03 R | 07.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 RJ 04775/00 | 08.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 RJ 4142/02 | 12.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 46/03 R | 19.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 207/99 | 24.02.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KR 455/00 | 28.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 21/02 R | 18.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3330 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3330 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3330 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 78/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-78-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-78-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 14/00 W 01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-14-00-w-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-14-00-w-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 220/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-220-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-220-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 366/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-366-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-366-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 725/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-725-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-725-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 686/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-686-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-686-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 656/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-656-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-656-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RJ 652/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-rj-652-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-rj-652-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 620/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-620-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-620-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RJ 602/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-rj-602-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:51:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:51:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-rj-602-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 538/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-538-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:50:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:50:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-538-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 347/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-347-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:50:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:50:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-347-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 286/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-286-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:50:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:50:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-286-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 127/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-127-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:50:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:50:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-127-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 117/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-117-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:50:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:50:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-117-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 238/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-238-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:48:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:48:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-238-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 325/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-325-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:47:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:47:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-325-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 18/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-18-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-18-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 2/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-2-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-2-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 1/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-1-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-1-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 88/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-88-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:07:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:07:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-88-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 10/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-10-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-10-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 46/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-46-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-46-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 21/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-21-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-21-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 78/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-78-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:51:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:51:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-78-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a7d356b8de5342f04f0e996fe8dabb5c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:78232d98d151d6b061240d1ca6644d90:0.03683600 1750883588 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.