| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 2979/01 | 05.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1211/02 | 27.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 1431/01 | 16.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 5034/02 | 27.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 427/02 | 12.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 213/03 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 308/02 | 13.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 123/03 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 204/02 | 17.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 73/03 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 130/02 | 08.01.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 31/03 | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 RJ 271/00 | 20.11.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 706/01 | 24.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 226/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 RJ 975/97 | 11.11.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 697/98 | 12.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 RJ 1011/01 | 05.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 555/02 | 07.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 RJ 182/01 | 26.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 260/03 | 24.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 RJ 1242/99 A | 24.01.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RJ 132/02 | 08.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 1375/97 A | 23.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RJ 111/03 | 08.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 RA 325/97 | 16.10.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RA 241/01 | 05.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 RA 95/02 | 03.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RA 191/02 | 05.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 67/01 | 21.05.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 231/03 | 30.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 KA 83/01 | 21.11.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 72/02 | 12.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AL 434/01 | 11.07.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 321/02 | 19.08.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 14 RA 283/01 | 10.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 164/03 | 08.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 150/98 | 13.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 22/01 | 06.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 4. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 804/03 | 20.10.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 4. November 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 EG 10/02 | 15.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. November 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 138/04 | 30.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 24/04 R | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 VG 623/04 | 07.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 VG 17/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 26 (17) U 22/03 | 02.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 288/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. November 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 SB 66/03 | 29.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 3. November 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3340 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3340 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3340 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1211/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1211-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1211-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 5034/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-5034-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-5034-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 213/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-213-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-213-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 123/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-123-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-123-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 73/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-73-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-73-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 31/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-31-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-31-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 706/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-706-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-706-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 697/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-697-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-697-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 RJ 555/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-rj-555-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-rj-555-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 260/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-260-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-260-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RJ 132/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-rj-132-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-rj-132-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RJ 111/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-rj-111-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-rj-111-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111293 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RA 241/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-ra-241-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-ra-241-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 RA 191/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-ra-191-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-ra-191-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 231/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-231-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-231-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 72/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-72-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-72-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 111283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 321/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-321-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:49:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:49:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-321-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 164/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-164-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:50:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:50:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-164-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 22/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-22-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:39:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:39:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-22-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 804/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-804-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-804-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140742 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 EG 10/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-eg-10-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-eg-10-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 138/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-138-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-138-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 VG 623/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-vg-623-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-vg-623-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 (17) U 22/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-17-u-22-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-17-u-22-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SB 66/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sb-66-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sb-66-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1211/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1211-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1211-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 026224c9dad9664099cb6a13edf0cffe [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:198cfc5414c90461096b7e891cfc7906:0.67685500 1750752573 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.