| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 AL 2119/01 | 03.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2544/02 | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 AL 2008/01 | 30.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 529/02 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 312/02 B | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 AL 0016/01 | 26.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 1777/02 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 314/02 B | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AL 1848/00 | 20.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 4655/00 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 AL 1819/00 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1098/01 | 17.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 233/02 B | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 AL 418/01 | 26.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 3215/01 | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 08.04.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 2/03 R | 19.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 05.05.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 03.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 1/04 R | 27.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 24.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 31.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 37/02 R | 13.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1600/03 ER | 05.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 8/04 KR ER | 05.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 141/04 ER | 20.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 B 43/04 KR ER | 02.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 AL 957/02 | 06.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 4663/02 | 26.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 287/98 | 09.05.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 90/01 | 30.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 382/97 | 07.02.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 38/02 | 30.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 23/00 | 16.11.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 160/01 | 30.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 17 SB 71/04 | 29.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 AL 44/04 ER | 13.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 145/03 | 03.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RJ 81/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 57/03 | 08.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 42/04 R | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 4 KN 122/00 | 31.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 15. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 AL 2776/98 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 2392/01 | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 59/02 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Oktober 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 AL 3008/02 ER-B | 10.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2380/02 ER-B | 14.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 9 J 1376/97 | 06.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 6 RJ 34/02 | 15.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. Oktober 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 KR 164/02 | 11.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 14. Oktober 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 23 AL 1651/03 | 10.10.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 13. Oktober 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3345 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3345 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3345 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 83600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2544/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2544-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2544-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 529/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-529-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-529-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 1777/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-1777-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-1777-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 4655/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-4655-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-4655-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1098/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1098-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1098-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 3215/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-3215-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-3215-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83006 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 1/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-1-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-1-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 83002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 37/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-37-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:06:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:06:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-37-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 8/04 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-8-04-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-8-04-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 B 43/04 KR ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-b-43-04-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-b-43-04-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 4663/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-4663-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:34:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:34:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-4663-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 90/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-90-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-90-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 38/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-38-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-38-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 160/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-160-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-160-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SB 71/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-sb-71-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-sb-71-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 44/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-44-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-44-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 145/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-145-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-145-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 57/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-57-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-57-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KN 122/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kn-122-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kn-122-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 2392/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-2392-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-2392-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2380/02 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2380-02-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2380-02-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 34/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-34-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:39:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:39:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-34-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 164/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-164-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-164-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AL 1651/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-al-1651-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-al-1651-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2544/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2544-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:35:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:35:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2544-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9754071c3e8d507e6ef59b26d55e4ce0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2cf53262ea52cb050b35168986204a95:0.48559800 1750707233 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.