| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 24 AS 28342/14 | 08.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 1798/18 | 05.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 191 AS 5837/12 | 01.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1288/15 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Dezember 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 169 KR 4213/15 | 29.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 12/18 | 17.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 79/20 B | 18.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Dezember 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 21 SO 290/16 | 31.07.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 91/17 | 15.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 88/20 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 370/14 | 13.05.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 70/16 | 15.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 158/16 | 05.02.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 30/19 | 15.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AS 1720/20 ER | 16.07.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AS 543/20 B ER | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 15 KR 55/12 | 03.09.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 251/14 | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 KR 5611/18 | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 52/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 32 AL 662/17 | 05.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 145/19 | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 37/20 B | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 889/19 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 512/20 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 1066/19 ER | 28.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 753/20 B ER | 12.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 16 KA 29/16 | 21.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 25/18 | 10.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/20B | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AS 1414/20 | 17.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 1859/20 | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 219/20 | 17.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 356/20 | 26.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 1590/19 | 23.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 496/17 | 19.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 531/19 | 10.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 92/17 | 03.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 AS 983/20 ER | 12.11.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 30. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 1145/17 | 09.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3835/18 | 12.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 2046/18 | 17.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2687/19 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 11 U 2529/14 | 28.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2238/15 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 335 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 335 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 335 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1798/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1798-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1798-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1288/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1288-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1288-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126743 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 12/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-12-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-12-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 91/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-91-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-91-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 70/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-70-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-70-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160480 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 30/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-30-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-30-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160476 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 543/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-543-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-543-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 251/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-251-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-251-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 52/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-52-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-52-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 145/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-145-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-145-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 512/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-512-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-512-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 753/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-753-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-753-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 25/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-25-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-25-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 1414/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-1414-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-1414-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 1859/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-1859-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-1859-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 219/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-219-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-219-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 356/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-356-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-356-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 1590/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-1590-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:47:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:47:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-1590-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 AL 496/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-al-496-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-al-496-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 AL 531/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-al-531-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-al-531-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 92/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-92-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-92-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 983/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-983-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-983-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3835/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3835-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:20:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:20:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3835-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2687/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2687-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:20:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:20:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2687-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 155104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2238/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2238-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:20:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:20:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2238-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1798/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1798-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1798-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2d2024aeabb55487bb70a8247bcf15e1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b6b9ae3efeb45d815ca2d7c9d773605d:0.26786200 1751351791 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.