| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 4 RA 4041/93 | 18.10.1995 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 49/96 | 11.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RJ 2818/01 | 05.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RJ 31/03 | 26.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 39 RA 4429/97 | 17.06.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 123/98 | 07.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 53/93 | 01.07.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 42/98 | 10.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 47 SB 2849/00 | 24.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 15/02 | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 RA 3935/01 | 22.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 50/02 | 05.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 6099/02 | 13.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 120/03 | 29.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 177/00 | 09.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 U 12/03 | 08.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 KR 195/97 | 21.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 18. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 SB 144/03 | 19.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 18. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 2103/02 | 30.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 79/02 | 25.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AL 1065/03 | 04.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 45/03 | 25.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 236/03 | 07.06.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 KR 516/04.ER | 26.07.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 16. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 V 10/98 ZDG | 23.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VS 17/02 ZDG | 11.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 33/96 | 07.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 420/02 | 12.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 131/94 | 18.09.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 410/96 | 30.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 U 399/01 | 20.05.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 260/03 | 12.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 U 150/00 | 18.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 128/03 | 30.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 125/01 | 13.02.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 87/03 | 04.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 153/01 | 10.01.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 20/03 | 12.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 SB 747/00 | 27.03.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 51/03 | 06.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 RJ 339/02 | 07.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 593/02 | 12.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 10 RJ 250/00 A | 02.06.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 581/03 | 19.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 RJ 460/00 A | 12.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 564/02 | 18.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 127/04 B | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 49/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-49-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-49-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 31/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-31-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-31-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 123/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-123-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-123-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99658 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 42/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-42-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-42-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 15/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-15-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-15-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 50/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-50-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-50-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 120/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-120-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-120-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 U 12/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-u-12-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-u-12-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 195/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-195-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-195-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 144/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-144-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-144-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 79/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-79-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-79-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 45/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-45-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-45-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 236/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-236-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-236-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 516/04.ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-516-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:59:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:59:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-516-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VS 17/02 ZDG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vs-17-02-zdg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vs-17-02-zdg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 420/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-420-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:44:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:44:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-420-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 410/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-410-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:44:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:44:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-410-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 260/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-260-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:44:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:44:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-260-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 128/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-128-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:44:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:44:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-128-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 87/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-87-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-87-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 20/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-20-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-20-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 51/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-51-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-51-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 RJ 593/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-rj-593-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-rj-593-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 581/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-581-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-581-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 564/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-564-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-564-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 49/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-49-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:49:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:49:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-49-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e5a9f96a214bf2b562a390576d2f9560 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c2886ba9655799d2a29089fe14b370e6:0.10401600 1750529419 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.