| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 169/01 | 27.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 37/03 | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 08.05.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 42/03 R | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 17.09.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 56/03 R | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 8 RJ 20/99 | 12.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 (18) RJ 32/02 | 07.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 34/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 7 KR 63/01 | 25.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 39/03 | 18.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/04 B | 14.07.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 126/95 | 29.07.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 177/00 | 19.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/04 B | 26.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 15 KA 27/01 | 12.12.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 10/02 | 18.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 9/03 R | 28.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 25 P 5/00 | 22.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 P 2/01 | 20.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 7/03 R | 13.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 P 2438/00 | 16.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 4029/01 | 31.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 3/03 R | 13.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 1506/97 | 10.12.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 292/99 | 27.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 2/03 R | 26.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 28 KR 37/01 | 07.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 142/03 | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/04 R | 26.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 8 AL 1163/01 | 05.12.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 129/02 | 31.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 102/03 R | 02.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 134/99 | 12.06.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KA 73/01 | 10.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 13/03 R | 10.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 295/02 | 09.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 5/03 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 11/03 R | 27.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 354/03 | 03.08.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 12. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 70 AL 5274/02 | 20.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 67/03 | 14.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KR 803/01 | 23.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 759/01 | 05.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 17 (12) SB 148/01 | 16.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 11. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 441/01 | 21.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 3/03 | 04.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 75/02 | 05.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 170/01 | 11.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 23/03 | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 11 P 47/02 | 21.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 P 3/04 | 17.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 274/01 | 10.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 326/02 | 14.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2004 | |
| S 3 U 163/02 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 312/02 | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 U 902/99 | 09.07.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 277/02 | 11.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 37/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-37-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-37-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 42/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-42-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-42-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 56/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-56-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-56-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 34/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-34-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-34-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 1/04 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-1-04-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-1-04-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 9/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-9-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-9-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 7/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-7-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-7-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 5/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-5-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-5-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 102/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-102-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-102-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 13/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-13-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-13-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 11/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-11-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-11-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 354/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-354-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-354-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 67/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-67-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-67-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 759/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-759-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-759-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140641 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 (12) SB 148/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-12-sb-148-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-12-sb-148-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 3/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-3-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-3-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 KA 75/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-ka-75-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:22:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:22:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-ka-75-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 23/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-23-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-23-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 P 3/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-p-3-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-p-3-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 326/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-326-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-326-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 312/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-312-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:43:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:43:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-312-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 277/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-277-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:42:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:42:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-277-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 37/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-37-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-37-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => abd96a8442264d0720e88da14e0c7894 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:79dccc2dff3ed34a4b6e36af48b65384:0.59208900 1750513868 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.