| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 RJ 973/00 | 25.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RJ 30/01 | 19.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 RJ 1202/00 | 11.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 RJ 28/02 | 15.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 2537/98 | 30.10.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 139/98 | 27.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 296/02 | 11.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 P 23/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. August 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 11.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 05.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 4/04 R | 19.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 05.02.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 03.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 61/03 R | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 17.09.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 57/03 R | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 18.08.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 55/03 R | 06.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 18.09.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 44/03 R | 06.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | 15.05.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 32/03 R | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 KA 3397/00 | 17.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3535/02 | 26.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/03 R | 28.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 17 KR 101/01 | 24.05.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 61/02 | 10.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 4/03 R | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 16/00 | 28.08.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/03 R | 10.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 RA 3433/00 | 20.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 3056/01 | 24.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 126/03 B | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. August 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 KR 119/04 ER | 17.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 30. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 60/04 | 06.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 30. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 369/03 | 29.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 30. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 59/01 | 16.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 72/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 (3) AL 17/02 | 06.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 160/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 189/01 | 17.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 269/02 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 KR 106/04 ER | 24.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 RA 132/00 | 16.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RA 31/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 30 AL 228/03 | 07.07.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 30. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 RA 80/03 | 07.06.2004 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 27. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 33 AL 85/04 | 14.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 26. Juli 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3367 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3367 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3367 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84150, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 30/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-30-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-30-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99641 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 RJ 28/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-rj-28-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-rj-28-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 139/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-139-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-139-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135477 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 296/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-296-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-296-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 4/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-4-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-4-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 61/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-61-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-61-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 57/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-57-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-57-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 55/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-55-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-55-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 44/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-44-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-44-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 32/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-32-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:04:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:04:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-32-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 19/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-19-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-19-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 126/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-126-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-126-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 119/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-119-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-119-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 60/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-60-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-60-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 369/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-369-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-369-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 59/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-59-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-59-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 (3) AL 17/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-3-al-17-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-3-al-17-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 189/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-189-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-189-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 106/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-106-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-106-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 RA 132/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ra-132-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ra-132-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AL 228/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-al-228-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-al-228-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 RA 80/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ra-80-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ra-80-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AL 85/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-al-85-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-al-85-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 30/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-30-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-30-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b61ad8e20282faab1b9d199938a80ea0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:493f3fe83cf3485b0660c2ea9e7b3473:0.33823000 1750491224 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.