| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 RJ 4835/00 | 29.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 RJ 2117/02 | 13.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 28/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RA 218/00 | 30.10.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 26/02 | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 39/03 R | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 8 RA 137/99 | 27.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 RA 81/00 | 11.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 36/02 R | 30.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 1850/97 | 23.03.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KR 556/00 | 06.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/02 R | 17.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 KR 322/03 | 07.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 8. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 39/03 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 7. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 39/03 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 7. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 33/03 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 7. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 94/02 | 04.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 7. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 24/01 | 10.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 5. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 RA 30/02 | 31.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 5. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 (7) KR 35/03 | 16.04.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 89/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 5. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 36/01 | 08.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 27/03 | 08.06.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 3 P 36/98 | 19.04.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 P 8/00 | 23.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 9 KR 58/04 ER | 14.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 1. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 U 88/02 | 09.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 (4) KG 6/02 | 25.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 U 28/01 | 01.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 25/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 1. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 10 U 54/03 | 16.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 59/04 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 1. Juli 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 67/03 | 28.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 1. Juli 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 14 RJ 177/99 | 20.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 RJ 108/01 | 10.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 3/03 R | 25.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 RJ 83/01 | 31.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 RJ 94/01 | 11.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 62/02 R | 25.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Juli 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 4 AL 7/00 | 28.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 165/02 | 14.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Juni 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 15.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 45/03 R | 25.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 17 KR 50/00 | 23.11.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 13/02 | 26.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/03 R | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3371 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3371 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3371 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 28/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-28-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-28-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 39/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-39-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-39-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 36/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-36-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-36-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 322/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-322-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:19:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:19:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-322-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 39/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-39-03-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-39-03-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 39/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-39-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-39-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 33/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-33-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-33-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 94/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-94-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-94-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 24/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-24-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-24-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 30/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-30-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-30-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 (7) KR 35/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-7-kr-35-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-7-kr-35-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 27/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-27-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-27-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 P 8/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-p-8-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-p-8-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 58/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-58-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-58-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 88/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-88-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-88-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 (4) KG 6/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-4-kg-6-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-4-kg-6-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 28/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-28-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-28-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 54/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-54-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-54-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 67/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-67-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-67-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 62/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-62-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-62-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 165/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-165-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-165-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 45/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-45-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-45-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 6/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-6-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-6-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 28/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-28-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-28-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e5bf0d0250df2809913d395a0e8fd25a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:27f69f2471203da2e98b45752f74fb84:0.87693000 1753232191 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.