| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 13 AL 152/00 | 07.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 121/01 | 17.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Juni 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RA 882/02 | 21.10.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 01.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 53/03 R | 18.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 158/02 | 07.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 53/02 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 9/03 R | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 10 EG 148/02 | 17.12.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 17/03 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 8/03 R | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 183/02 | 01.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 43/02 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 7/03 R | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 29 EG 108/02 | 09.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 29/02 | 30.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 6/03 R | 18.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 31.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 46/03 R | 01.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 24.03.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 14/04 R | 01.04.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 17 KA 486/00 | 26.02.2003 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 25/03 R | 28.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 02.10.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 31/03 R | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 KR 730/97 | 01.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 38/00 | 01.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 12/03 R | 04.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | 24.08.1999 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 20.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/03 R | 24.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 KR 210/02 | 29.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 142/02 | 28.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/03 R | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 16 (12) VS 26/94 | 04.12.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 VS 4/99 | 15.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VS 2/01 R | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 V 22/96 | 22.05.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 VS 42/98 | 19.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VS 1/02 R | 25.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 22 AL 62/01 | 09.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 58/02 | 06.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 54/03 R | 10.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 17 KA 71/00 | 30.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 KA 3/02 | 13.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/03 R | 28.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 1 U 301/00 | 25.09.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 349/01 | 15.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/03 R | 24.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 RJ 103/98 | 30.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RJ 140/00 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 64/02 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 9 RA 948/02 | 13.03.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 RA 330/03 | 05.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 203/03 B | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 2433/96-2 | 27.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 RA 54/00 | 07.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 224/03 B | 31.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 RJ 237/02 | 21.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RJ 64/03 | 30.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 44/03 R | 11.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 2 AL 1723/99 | 28.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 3267/00 | 20.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 35/03 R | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 RJ 20/96 | 27.08.1998 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 133/98 | 20.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 24/03 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. Juni 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 121/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-121-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-121-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 RA 882/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ra-882-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ra-882-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 53/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-53-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-53-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 9/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-9-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-9-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 8/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-8-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-8-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 7/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-7-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-7-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 6/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-6-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:03:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:03:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-6-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82870 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 46/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-46-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-46-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 14/04 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-14-04-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-14-04-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 25/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-25-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-25-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 31/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-31-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-31-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 12/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-12-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-12-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 1/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-1-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-1-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VS 2/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vs-2-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vs-2-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VS 1/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vs-1-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vs-1-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 54/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-54-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-54-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 64/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-64-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-64-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 203/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-203-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-203-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 224/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-224-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-224-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 44/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-44-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-44-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 35/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-35-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:02:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:02:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-35-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 24/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-24-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-24-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-06-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-06-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 121/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-121-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:48:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:48:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-121-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1d69a5054e38d51712e1fd4064ae5e9e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b5304ebfd5856d55177b105ca55a077b:0.35121800 1750367997 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.