| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 RA 112/00-8 | 22.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 47/02 | 29.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 23.04.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 05.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 14/03 R | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. April 2004 | ||
| 30.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 44/03 R | 10.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. April 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 12.08.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 98/02 R | 10.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 4 AL 106/98 | 22.09.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 147/99 | 05.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 27/03 R | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. April 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 (16) U 168/99 | 26.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 270/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 149/02 | 16.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 2. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 4 (25) RA 22/00 | 21.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 14 KA 208/01 | 23.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 30 AL 427/02 | 27.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 104/03 | 28.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 24/04 R | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. April 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 687/99-15 | 22.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 48/02 | 07.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 937/99 | 19.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 17/02 | 14.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 31 RJ 2950/01 | 28.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RJ 8/03 | 20.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 RA 2155/98 | 30.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 5/01 | 27.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AL 3788/99 | 28.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 47/01 | 19.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 06.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 32/02 | 27.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 91/00 | 23.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 04.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 171/02 ER | 05.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 30.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 43/02 | 21.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 KR 27/02 | 20.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 35/03 | 10.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 797/03 ER | 06.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 169/03 ER | 01.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 1301/98 | 09.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 107/01 KR | 24.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 1341/02 | 14.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 251/01 | 10.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 3 KA 306/97 | 11.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 1. April 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 47/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-47-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-47-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 14/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-14-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-14-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 44/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-44-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-44-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 98/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-98-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-98-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 27/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-27-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-27-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 (16) U 168/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-16-u-168-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-16-u-168-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 149/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-149-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-149-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 (25) RA 22/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-25-ra-22-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-25-ra-22-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 208/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-208-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-208-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AL 427/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-al-427-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-al-427-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 17/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-17-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-17-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RJ 8/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-rj-8-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-rj-8-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 5/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-5-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-5-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 47/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-47-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-47-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 32/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-32-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-32-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 91/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-91-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-91-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 171/02 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-171-02-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-171-02-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 43/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-43-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-43-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 35/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-35-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-35-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 169/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-169-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:37:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:37:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-169-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 107/01 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-107-01-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-107-01-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 1341/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-1341-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-1341-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KA 251/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-ka-251-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-ka-251-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KA 306/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ka-306-97-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ka-306-97-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 47/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-47-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-47-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bd24e91a4f1ae72a1f02d7ad67f76060 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ad41f1d800f33ea4b6e22ba573c45185:0.01975800 1750261381 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.