| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Speyer | 29.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 RI 311/03 | 23.03.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 1. April 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 4466/99 | 23.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 45/01 | 27.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 1166/01 | 08.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 96/01 | 04.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 366/99 | 18.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 573/01 | 20.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 3462/99 | 11.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 51/01 | 13.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 1798/00 | 20.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RA 20/01 | 13.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 32 RJ 1592/00 | 16.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RJ 26/02 | 21.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 29 RJ 887/02 | 22.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RJ 70/02 | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 1295/00 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 39/01 | 13.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 1008/02 | 30.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 82/02 | 26.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 1019/98-36 | 04.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 472/01 | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. April 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 U 221/99 | 07.11.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 488/00 | 11.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 U 5052/00 | 05.07.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 270/01 | 28.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 92/98 | 23.11.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 118/01 | 30.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | 17.07.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 53/02 R | 05.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 14 KN 1246/99 KR | 10.10.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 7/02 KR R | 24.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 2 KA 66/02 | 18.09.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 56/02 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 BU 117/98 | 29.09.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 KN 106/98 U | 29.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 1/02 U R | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 18 KR 127/99 | 26.04.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 78/01 | 20.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 26/02 R | 16.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 (2) KR 70/96 | 13.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 203/01 | 07.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 39/02 R | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3609/99 | 22.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1169/01 | 08.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/03 R | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 KR 3932/98 | 23.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1525/01 | 08.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/03 R | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 KR 70/99 | 15.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 223/00 | 19.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/02 R | 03.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 3239/99 | 25.07.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 3509/00 | 21.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/03 R | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 U 839/01 | 18.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 4605/01 | 24.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 52/02 R | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. März 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3386 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3386 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3386 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RI 311/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ri-311-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ri-311-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 45/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-45-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-45-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 96/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-96-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-96-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 573/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-573-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-573-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 51/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-51-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-51-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RA 20/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ra-20-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ra-20-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 26/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-26-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-26-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 70/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-70-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-70-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 39/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-39-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-39-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 82/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-82-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:47:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:47:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-82-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 472/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-472-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-472-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 488/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-488-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:25:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:25:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-488-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 270/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-270-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:19:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:19:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-270-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 118/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-118-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:14:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:14:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-118-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 53/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-53-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-53-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 7/02 KR R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-7-02-kr-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-7-02-kr-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 56/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-56-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-56-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 1/02 U R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-1-02-u-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-1-02-u-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 26/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-26-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-26-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 39/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-39-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-39-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 10/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-10-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-10-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 8/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-8-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-8-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 18/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-18-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-18-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 52/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-52-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-52-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-04-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-04-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RI 311/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ri-311-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ri-311-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3abe2efd2132d7b41509d2c5fd07b29c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d5b153165a5b67f0f56039d59ae1fd83:0.48096400 1750244082 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.