Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 KA 3737/00 | 17.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 4356/01 | 13.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/03 R | 05.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RA 549/00 | 28.11.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 59/02 | 05.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 34/03 R | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 (3337) P 4/97 | 17.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 P 19/01 | 01.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 5/02 R | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 46 V 106/96 | 17.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 V 16/00 | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 7/03 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 556/99 | 25.08.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KA 106/00 | 12.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 31/01 R | 21.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 AL 1706/00 | 17.07.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 1018/01 | 05.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 67/02 R | 05.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 5 AL 202/00 | 04.10.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 1424/00 | 20.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 66/02 R | 03.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 12 AL 627/99 | 10.02.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 523/00 | 17.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 6/02 R | 27.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 4 AL 513/99 | 13.09.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AL 475/01 | 13.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 104/02 R | 27.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 RJ 41/94 | 10.01.1995 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RJ 37/95 W 98 | 12.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 RA 3576/98-2 | 13.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RA 18/02 | 12.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 RJ 1261/00 | 06.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RJ 59/02 | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 24 RJ 1027/99 | 22.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RJ 87/00 | 22.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 47 V 134/97 W 01 | 26.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 V 48/02 | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 24 RJ 104/00 | 18.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RJ 81/02 | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 282/98 | 28.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 111/01 | 25.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 19 RA 1555/00 | 27.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 37/03 | 08.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 75/99 | 22.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 32/01 | 19.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. März 2004 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 63 AL 3034/98 | 23.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 61/01 | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. März 2004 | |
12.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 8/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 | |||
Sozialgericht Münster | 28.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 49/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 | ||
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 U 199/99 | 01.03.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 50/01 | 06.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 21/02 R | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 1 KR 135/99 | 02.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 4/00 | 12.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 23/02 R | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 |
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 139/01 | 15.11.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 36/01 R | 25.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 | ||
Sozialgericht Speyer | S 1 U 221/00 | 29.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 U 205/01 | 25.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 39/02 R | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. März 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 34/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-34-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-34-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 5/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-5-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-5-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 7/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-7-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-7-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 31/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-31-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-31-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 67/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-67-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-67-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 66/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-66-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-66-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 6/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-6-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-6-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 104/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-104-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:28:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:28:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-104-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 37/95 W 98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-37-95-w-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-37-95-w-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RA 18/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ra-18-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ra-18-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RJ 59/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-rj-59-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-rj-59-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 87/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-87-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-87-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 V 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-v-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-v-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RJ 81/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-rj-81-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-rj-81-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 111/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-111-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-111-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 37/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-37-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-37-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 32/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-32-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-32-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 61/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-61-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-61-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82810 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 8/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-8-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-8-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 49/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-49-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-49-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 21/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-21-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-21-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 23/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-23-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-23-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 36/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-36-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:35:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:35:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-36-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 39/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-39-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-39-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 571a10817a63fd6cf71597522d806381 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e50c689b06147a014604d28f58816d21:0.40482100 1750196125 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.