| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 44/01 | 30.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 10/02 | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 8 RJ 528/99 | 27.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 128/01 | 27.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 583/00 | 29.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 203/01 | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 158/98 | 21.08.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 70/98 W 02 | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 RJ 1956/00 | 27.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RJ 77/02 | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 21 RJ 935/99 | 15.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RJ 78/00 | 10.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 KR 72/01 | 19.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 23. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 8 AL 73/03 | 23.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 22. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 3 RA 1055/99-14 | 16.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 85/03 | 14.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. März 2004 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 B 239/03 ER | 05.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 20. März 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 1150/01 | 05.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20. März 2004 | ||
| 21.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 19.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 26/02 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 | |||
| 11.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 5/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 | |||
| 26.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 P 7/03 R | 12.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stade | 29.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 12/02 R | 16.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 6 LW 4/98 | 16.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 LW 29/00 | 28.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 6/01 R | 11.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 21 (9) RJ 50/94 | 25.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 RJ 47/99 | 18.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 41/03 R | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 12 RJ 346/01 | 12.12.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 23/02 | 22.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 5/03 R | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 3 VS 182/99 | 25.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 VS 28/00 | 31.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VS 1/01 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Rostock | S 2 VJ 24/98 | 22.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 3 VJ 30/00 | 10.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VJ 2/02 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 1 AL 560/99 | 11.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 157/01 | 05.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 22/03 R | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 23.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 ER 59/03 U | 20.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | 21.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 RI 160/03 | 12.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 U 228/00 | 10.07.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 260/02 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 201/00 | 29.05.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 250/02 | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. März 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 84750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 10/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-10-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-10-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 128/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-128-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-128-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 203/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-203-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-203-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 70/98 W 02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-70-98-w-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-70-98-w-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RJ 77/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-rj-77-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-rj-77-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 78/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-78-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-78-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 72/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-72-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-72-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 73/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-73-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-73-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 85/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-85-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-85-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 239/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-239-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-239-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 1150/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-1150-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-1150-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 26/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-26-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-26-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 P 7/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-p-7-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-p-7-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 12/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-12-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:01:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:01:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-12-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 6/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-6-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-6-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 41/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-41-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-41-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VS 1/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vs-1-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vs-1-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VJ 2/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vj-2-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vj-2-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 22/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-22-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-22-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 ER 59/03 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-er-59-03-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-er-59-03-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RI 160/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ri-160-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ri-160-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 260/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-260-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:35:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:35:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-260-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 250/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-250-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:35:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:35:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-250-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 10/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-10-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-10-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8fd451b528bdea1b83715e297dc7b3e0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:dba6078913d73600da0c7ccccca803b9:0.15607900 1750190324 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.