| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 KR 441/98 | 18.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 173/01 | 29.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 44 V 58/03 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 A 34/03 | 04.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 AL 1009/02 | 10.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 8/03 | 24.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 1033/00 | 17.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 77/01 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 1200/99 | 09.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 255/01 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 52 AL 2493/00 | 02.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 179/00 | 24.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 12.04.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 11/02 R | 11.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. März 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 15.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 21/03 R | 18.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 91/02 | 14.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 1 RA 3033/98 | 14.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 15/02 | 29.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 RA 5735/01 | 03.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 2/02 | 27.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 5 AL 200/02 | 27.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 192/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 6 RJ 101/01 | 15.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 54/02 | 04.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 1 AL 98/00 | 18.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 90/02 | 20.02.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 86 KR 1117/00*75 | 06.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 410/01 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 38 RA 3996/96 | 28.05.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 RA 90/98 | 09.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AL 3765/00 | 25.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AL 74/01 | 09.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 U 857/99 | 11.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 U 36/02 | 14.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 4499/00 | 25.09.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 60/01 | 29.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 3219/99 | 10.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 71/01 | 27.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 RA 1040/95-W 99 | 10.12.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 RA 2/00 | 09.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. März 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | 13.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 133/02 | 18.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 1. März 2004 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 RI 310/01 | 17.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 1. März 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 02.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 B 126/03 SB | 27.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 1. März 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 82 KR 1829/00*36 | 20.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 740/01 | 10.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. März 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3402 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3402 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3402 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 173/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-173-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-173-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99565 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 A 34/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-a-34-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-a-34-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 8/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-8-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-8-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 77/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-77-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-77-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 255/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-255-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-255-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 179/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-179-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-179-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 11/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-11-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-11-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 21/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-21-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-21-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 91/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-91-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:20:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:20:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-91-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 15/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-15-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-15-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99558 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 2/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-2-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-2-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 200/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-200-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-200-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 54/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-54-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-54-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 90/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-90-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-90-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 410/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-410-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-410-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 RA 90/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ra-90-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ra-90-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 74/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-74-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-74-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 36/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-36-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-36-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 60/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-60-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-60-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 71/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-71-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-71-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 RA 2/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ra-2-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ra-2-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 133/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-133-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-133-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RI 310/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ri-310-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ri-310-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 B 126/03 SB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-b-126-03-sb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-b-126-03-sb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99548 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 740/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-740-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-740-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 173/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-173-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-173-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 59346d0621566e1b7d00fc056bf4bdd8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:10ffce575b8f9ae6a9f479771ac534ea:0.87681600 1750034400 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.