| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 25/03 R | 16.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 16.12.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/03 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12.02.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 4/02 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 22 AL 197/00 | 05.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 167/01 | 24.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 54/02 R | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 15.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 55/02 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 11.10.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 07.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 51/02 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 06.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 32/02 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 AL 175/99 | 15.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 45/01 | 16.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 30/03 R | 16.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 59 AL 1792/00 | 20.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 17/01 | 04.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 20/03 R | 16.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 14 RJ 8/00 | 04.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 1 RJ 19/02 | 26.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 179/03 B | 12.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 8 RA 21/00 | 18.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 RA 8/01 | 18.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 37/03 B | 23.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 6 KNK 5/00 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KNK 3/01 | 22.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 2/02 KR R | 24.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 253/00 | 26.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 90/02 | 28.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 24/03 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 7 V 249/95 | 01.04.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 V 977/98 | 21.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 12/01 R | 18.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 19 V 111/01 | 28.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 V 27/02 | 12.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 10/02 R | 18.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 RA 277/96 | 08.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 (3) RA 91/00 | 30.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 25/03 R | 23.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 2 RA 420/00 | 15.05.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 15/13 RA 934/01 | 21.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 15/03 R | 23.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | S 1 AL 92/99 | 16.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 2 AL 5/01 | 29.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 13/03 R | 16.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 10/20 RJ 410/93 | 30.11.1995 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 RJ 350/96 | 23.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 38/03 B | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 10 RA 264/00 | 16.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RA 153/00 | 13.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 54/02 R | 23.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 9 KN 20/03 P | 18.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 5. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 AL 1/03 | 25.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 5. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 284/02 | 11.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 P 11/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 4. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 KN 32/03 KR | 10.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 KN 162/03 KR | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 4. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 19 VG 360/02 | 18.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 4. Februar 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3408 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3408 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3408 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 5/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-5-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-5-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 4/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-4-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-4-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 54/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-54-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-54-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 55/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-55-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-55-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 51/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-51-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-51-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 32/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-32-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-32-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 30/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-30-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-30-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 20/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-20-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-20-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 179/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-179-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-179-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 37/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-37-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-37-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 2/02 KR R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-2-02-kr-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-2-02-kr-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 24/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-24-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-24-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 12/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-12-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-12-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 10/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-10-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-10-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 25/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-25-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-25-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 15/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-15-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-15-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 13/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-13-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-13-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 38/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-38-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-38-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 54/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-54-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-54-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KN 20/03 P [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kn-20-03-p [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kn-20-03-p/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 1/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-1-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-1-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 284/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-284-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-284-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KN 32/03 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kn-32-03-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kn-32-03-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 VG 360/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-vg-360-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-vg-360-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 23:00:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 22:00:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2400e9f4bf94887df775c50b6e466713 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:84b82b72d99b6c91e572fd695cd66b3d:0.08532500 1749886007 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.