| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 58/98 | 16.07.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 125/01 | 04.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 5 AL 781/02 ER | 23.05.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 B 130/03 AL-ER | 19.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 3. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 7 SB 198/01 | 29.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. Februar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 KA 1196/98 | 01.03.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 53/00 | 10.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KA 5076/99 | 27.06.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 523/00 | 15.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KA 3229/01 | 17.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 84/02 | 19.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Februar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 U 24/98 | 05.01.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 44/00 | 07.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 7 U 52/99 | 31.05.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 87/01 | 21.01.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 1 AL 50/98 | 27.07.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 191/00 | 24.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 75 KR 883/99 W 00 | 26.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 149/02 | 25.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 1 RA 2904/00 | 01.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RA 18/01 | 29.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 45 SB 1623/99-48 | 21.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 44/02 | 28.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 734/01 | 22.11.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 294/01 | 29.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 3/03 R | 08.09.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 535/01 | 19.10.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 262/01 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 10/03 | 08.09.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 535/01 | 19.10.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 262/01 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 10/03 | 08.09.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 AL 737/98 | 22.08.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 183/99 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 44/03 B | 07.05.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 1175/00 | 18.05.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 146/01 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AL 1025/00 | 28.03.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 112/02 | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 239/02 | 02.01.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 (16) AL 48/02 | 29.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 8 RJ 604/98 | 30.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 250/01 | 02.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 6 RA 6551/01-11 | 14.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RA 22/03 | 29.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 VG 139/01 | 17.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VG 32/02 | 28.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AL 1678/99 W 01 | 04.09.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 97/01 | 29.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 2 RJ 783/01 | 30.09.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 308/02 | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 9/04 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 125/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-125-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:45:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:45:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-125-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 B 130/03 AL-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-b-130-03-al-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-b-130-03-al-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SB 198/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sb-198-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sb-198-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 53/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-53-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:43:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:43:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-53-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 523/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-523-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:43:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:43:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-523-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 104980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 84/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-84-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:18:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:18:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-84-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153743 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 44/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-44-00-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-44-00-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 87/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-87-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-87-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 191/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-191-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-191-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 149/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-149-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-149-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 18/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-18-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-18-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 44/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-44-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:45:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:45:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-44-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 294/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-294-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-294-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 262/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-262-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-262-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 262/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-262-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-262-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 183/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-183-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-183-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 146/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-146-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-146-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 112/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-112-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-112-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 239/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-239-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-239-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 (16) AL 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-16-al-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-16-al-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 250/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-250-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-250-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 22/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-22-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-22-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 32/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-32-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-32-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 97/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-97-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-97-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 308/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-308-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-308-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 125/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-125-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:45:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:45:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-125-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c76944bae30795b9169c18b28b2d6d1b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c48eb2c02b670c08134c64538ade1973:0.39828800 1749818297 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.