| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RA 178/00 | 29.11.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 42/03 | 27.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 889/01 ER | 04.02.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 12/02 KA | 15.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 265/02 ER | 19.07.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 B 107/02 KR-ER | 10.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AL 358/00 | 15.03.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 125/01 | 25.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 3 AL 279/99 | 15.05.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 169/02 | 23.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 RA 100/02 | 28.01.2003 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 116/03 | 06.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 KR 55/02 | 07.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 235/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AL 133/02 | 02.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 136/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 33 AL 160/01 | 29.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 21. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 24/00 | 15.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 21. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 3889/00 | 30.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 12 RA 36/02 | 09.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 29/00 | 05.07.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 106/01 | 07.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 RJ 1277/97 | 08.11.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 314/02 | 12.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 15 RJ 247/00 | 25.04.2002 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 154/02 | 26.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 10 AL 342/00 | 18.05.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 135/01 | 09.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 38 RA 4100/01 | 16.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 59/02 | 08.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 40/00 | 17.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 KR 420/01 | 15.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 38 RA 623/97 | 21.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 RA 3/01 | 11.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | 31.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 12/02 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | 26.06.2002 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 30.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/03 R | 10.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schwerin | S 3 KA 12/98 | 23.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 1 KA 13/00 | 22.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 29/02 R | 16.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 KR 18/02 | 22.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 357/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 19. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 AL 26/03 | 29.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 19. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 7 SB 48/02 | 21.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 19. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 34/00 | 15.10.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 358/02 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Januar 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3413 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3413 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3413 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 42/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-42-03-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-42-03-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 12/02 KA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-12-02-ka [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-12-02-ka/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 B 107/02 KR-ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-b-107-02-kr-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-b-107-02-kr-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 125/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-125-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-125-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 169/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-169-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-169-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 116/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-116-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-116-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 55/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-55-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-55-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 133/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-133-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-133-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AL 160/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-al-160-01-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-al-160-01-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 24/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-24-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-24-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 RA 36/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ra-36-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ra-36-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 106/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-106-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-106-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 314/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-314-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-314-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 154/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-154-02-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-154-02-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 135/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-135-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-135-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 59/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-59-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-59-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 KR 420/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-kr-420-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-kr-420-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 3/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-3-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-3-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 12/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-12-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-12-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 29/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-29-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-29-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137657 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 18/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-18-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-18-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 26/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-26-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-26-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SB 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sb-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sb-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 110000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 358/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-358-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:30:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:30:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-358-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 42/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-42-03-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-42-03-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c91b8c6885fdc0ac80e27bee7ea200b8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5a30a1e1d113719bc4ea91f89cf7be3c:0.02720800 1749725434 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.