| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 18 RA 6860/02 | 20.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 RA 97/03 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 14. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 AL 118/01 | 01.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 22/02 | 15.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 16.12.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 4/03 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2004 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 07.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 20.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 44/02 R | 16.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 2 AL 32/00 | 13.03.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 34/02 | 29.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 1/03 R | 16.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 1981/99 | 20.03.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 111/00 | 26.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 88/02 R | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 3 RJ 413/99 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 RJ 79/01 | 04.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 55/99 | 30.03.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 17/00 | 09.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 6 RA 440/97 | 28.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 87/99 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 6 KN 181/02 | 01.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 KN 32/02 | 06.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 7 KR 131/01 | 20.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 6. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 46 RJ 150/03 | 13.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 6. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 12 P 237/00 | 25.08.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 6. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 1/02 | 06.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 6. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 1386/01 | 13.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 44/02 | 24.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 10 RA 260/01 | 07.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 8a Ar 74/95 | 18.07.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 6/1 Ar 107/96 | 10.09.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 72/98 R | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 13 Ar 75/95 | 19.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 6 Ar 17/97 | 10.09.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 67/98 R | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 13 Ar 117/95 | 02.05.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 6/1 Ar 79/96 | 19.11.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 7 Kn 27/97 | 27.06.1997 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 4 Kn 24/97 | 12.03.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 Kn 8/98 KR | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 11.11.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 P 40/96 | 22.07.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 17.03.1997 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 P 28/97 | 04.11.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 14.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 P 22/97 | 22.07.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 10.06.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 P 20/96 | 27.05.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | 3 RP 13/97 | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 | |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 11 Eg 77/96 | 14.11.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 6/1 Eg 4/96 | 10.07.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 1. Januar 2004 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 RA 6860/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ra-6860-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ra-6860-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 22/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-22-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-22-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 44/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-44-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-44-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 1/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-1-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-1-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 88/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-88-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-88-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 79/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-79-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-79-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 17/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-17-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-17-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 87/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-87-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-87-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KN 32/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-kn-32-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-kn-32-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 131/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-131-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-131-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 RJ 150/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-rj-150-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-rj-150-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 237/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-237-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-237-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 1/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-1-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:19:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:19:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-1-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 44/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-44-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-44-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RA 260/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ra-260-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ra-260-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6/1 Ar 107/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-1-ar-107-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:53:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:53:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-1-ar-107-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 Ar 17/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ar-17-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:53:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:53:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ar-17-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6/1 Ar 79/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-1-ar-79-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:53:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:53:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-1-ar-79-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131077 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 Kn 24/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kn-24-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kn-24-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 P 40/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-p-40-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-p-40-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 P 28/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-p-28-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-p-28-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 P 22/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-p-22-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-p-22-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 P 20/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-p-20-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-p-20-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6/1 Eg 4/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-1-eg-4-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-1-eg-4-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2004-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2004-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 RA 6860/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ra-6860-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ra-6860-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8476730a42b18a8e95753d23c2a9553b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c8fca5efa28030b6a634b114fea45145:0.76818100 1750530722 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.