| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 2536/16 | 24.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 4645/16 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 R 3068/15 | 04.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1849/17 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 AL 2340/15 | 28.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 4187/17 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 AL 2230/16 | 11.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2184/17 | 12.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 34/20 | 21.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 24. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 530/18 | 04.11.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 24. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 1851/18 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 24. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 VE 9/14 | 04.10.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 26/17 | 27.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 46/18 B | 09.01.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 819/15 | 28.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 203/16 | 29.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 5/18 R, B 13 R 203/18 B | 03.04.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 446/13 | 12.03.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 115/15 | 17.09.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 12 U 210/10 | 31.10.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 10/15 | 02.09.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 9 KR 307/15 | 10.12.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 389/15 | 12.05.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 58/16 B | 20.07.2016 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 24. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 9 KR 331/15 | 27.10.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 344/15 | 12.05.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 55/16 B | 20.07.2016 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 24. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 6 R 206/15 | 12.08.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 292/15 | 29.01.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 14 KR 404/18 | 19.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 179/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 239/14 | 08.12.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 11/15 | 15.07.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 73/16 B | 30.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 12 U 210/10 | 31.10.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 10/15 | 02.09.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 496/17 | 12.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 29/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 531/19 | 10.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 23/20 | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 92/17 | 03.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 25/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 67/19 | 19.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 1/20 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 18 AS 1558/19 | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1245/20 NZB | 11.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 19 SO 126/13 | 11.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 436/15 | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 27/20 B | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 3219/18 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1877/19 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 293/20 B | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 39 KR 2203/19 | 08.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 758/20 | 13.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 23. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 342 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 342 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 342 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 4645/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-4645-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-4645-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1849/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1849-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1849-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 4187/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-4187-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-4187-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2184/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2184-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2184-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 34/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-34-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-34-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 530/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-530-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-530-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SO 1851/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-so-1851-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-so-1851-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 VE 9/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ve-9-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ve-9-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 819/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-819-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-819-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 446/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-446-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-446-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 U 210/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-u-210-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-u-210-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 307/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-307-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-307-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 331/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-331-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-331-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 206/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-206-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-206-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 179/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-179-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-179-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 11/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-11-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:45:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:45:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-11-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 10/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-10-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-10-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 23/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-23-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-23-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 25/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-25-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-25-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1245/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1245-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1245-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 436/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-436-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-436-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1877/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1877-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1877-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 2203/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-2203-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-2203-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 4645/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-4645-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-4645-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ca2d7f37217dec4bbe8f43dbf9f226fc [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4c5406de008ed3069503c26abd9ee0b0:0.07731500 1755523983 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.