Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KR 2285/97 | 25.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 935/00 | 13.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/03 B | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 2 KA 571/99 | 16.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Mainz | 30. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 3 AL 125/01 | 17.12.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Mainz | 30. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 6 U 163/00 | 06.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Mainz | 30. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 2 KA 362/01 | 16.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Mainz | 30. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 36/00 | 20.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 53/02 | 25.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 8 RA 662/99 | 28.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 64/01 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 8 RJ 6/01 | 29.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 28/03 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 16 RA 565/02 | 15.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 154/03 | 04.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Dezember 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 J 423/00 | 02.07.2002 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 RJ 109/02 | 22.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Dezember 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 KR 647/00 | 12.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 23 KR 390/01 | 22.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 32 KA 832/98 | 07.07.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 119/99 | 08.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 51/02 R | 24.09.2003 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Schleswig | 15.10.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 09.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RA 2/03 R | 11.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 17/03 R | 20.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 27.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 09.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 27/02 R | 14.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Lübeck | 25.09.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 09.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 9/03 R | 23.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Schwerin | 23.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 22.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 39/02 R | 16.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 7 Ar 348/98 | 12.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 AL 57/01 | 28.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 92/02 R | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 13 AL 507/99 | 26.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 193/00 | 20.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 84/02 R | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Münster | S 15 AL 51/99 | 22.06.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 163/01 | 26.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 28/03 R | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 3 AL 367/99 | 13.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AL 380/01 | 11.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 4/03 R | 21.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 26 KA 18/01 | 23.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KA 23/02 | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 49/02 R | 16.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 1 P 33/00 | 09.04.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 P 13/01 | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 1/03 R | 24.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Dezember 2003 |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 121/03 | 26.11.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 19. Dezember 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3420 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3420 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3420 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 8/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-8-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-8-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 571/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-571-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-571-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 125/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-125-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-125-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 163/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-163-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-163-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 362/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-362-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-362-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 53/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-53-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-53-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 64/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-64-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-64-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 28/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-28-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-28-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 154/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-154-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:44:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:44:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-154-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RJ 109/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-rj-109-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:36:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:36:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-rj-109-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 647/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-647-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-647-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 390/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-390-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-390-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 106636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 119/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-119-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:41:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:41:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-119-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RA 2/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ra-2-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ra-2-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 17/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-17-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-17-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 27/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-27-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-27-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 9/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-9-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-9-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 39/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-39-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-39-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 92/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-92-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-92-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 84/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-84-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-84-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 28/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-28-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-28-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 49/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-49-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-49-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 1/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-1-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-1-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 121/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-121-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-121-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 8/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-8-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-8-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 38de1fbf6b97a4e2edb751d3bda166c9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0de5a0bf21a6bc83c33f227151770d24:0.78456300 1749488157 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.