| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 12.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 48/02 R | 23.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. November 2003 | ||
| 16.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 04.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/02 R | 01.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. November 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 14 VH 107/99 | 04.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 VU 24/01 | 20.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VU 2/03 B | 18.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. November 2003 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 23 U 577/96 | 31.10.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 334/97 | 28.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 272/98 | 24.06.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 333/99 | 23.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 12 RA 438/96 W 99 | 22.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 RA 2/01 | 15.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 AL 291/01 | 25.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AL 81/02 | 16.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 4081/00 | 30.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 49/01 | 27.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 3503/01 | 15.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 29/02 | 23.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 2806/95 | 18.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 RA 4/99 | 15.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 RA 1198/00 | 30.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 56/02 | 07.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 11.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 120/02 RA | 25.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 1 RJ 14/00 | 19.11.2001 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 RJ 14/02 | 21.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 U 183/01 | 23.09.2002 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 U 136/02 | 11.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 12 AL 199/02 | 18.03.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 AL 31/03 | 23.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 SB 282/01 | 13.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. November 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 KA 234/02 | 08.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. November 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 AL 192/03 ER | 30.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 B 68/03 AL ER | 06.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 16 VG 8/99 | 21.02.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 5/02 | 22.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 SB 372/00 | 16.07.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 76/01 | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 10 RJ 803/97 | 16.10.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 RJ 680/01 | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 201/02 | 12.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 649/02 | 30.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 243/99.A | 13.12.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 63/03 | 30.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 RJ 512/02 A | 04.11.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 627/02 | 26.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 RJ 722/99 | 30.05.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 626/01 | 26.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 85825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 48/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-48-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-48-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 22/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-22-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-22-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VU 2/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vu-2-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vu-2-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 334/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-334-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-334-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 333/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-333-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-333-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 RA 2/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ra-2-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ra-2-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AL 81/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-al-81-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-al-81-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 49/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-49-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-49-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 29/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-29-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-29-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 RA 4/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ra-4-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ra-4-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 56/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-56-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-56-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RA 120/02 RA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ra-120-02-ra [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:42:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:42:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ra-120-02-ra/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 RJ 14/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-rj-14-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-rj-14-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 U 136/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-u-136-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-u-136-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AL 199/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-al-199-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-al-199-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 SB 282/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-sb-282-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-sb-282-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 234/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-234-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-234-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AL 192/03 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-al-192-03-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:21:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:21:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-al-192-03-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 5/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-5-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-5-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 76/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-76-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-76-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 RJ 680/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-rj-680-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-rj-680-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 649/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-649-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-649-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 63/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-63-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-63-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 627/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-627-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-627-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 109414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 626/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-626-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:21:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:21:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-626-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 48/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-48-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:58:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:58:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-48-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2a1d7ffb50bf7e577d7aff60e95c96d6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5748cd2b60669feb6b7d9be62c598d1e:0.61240600 1749337839 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.