| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 U 76/99 | 08.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 108/00 | 14.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 U 262/90 | 07.09.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 107/99 | 18.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 U 5/99 | 12.01.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 107/01 | 28.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 124/97 | 17.11.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 105/99 | 22.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 U 302/98 | 11.10.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 104/00 | 11.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 8 U 4/00 | 17.01.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 103/02 | 23.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 U 268/96 | 12.02.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 102/98 | 10.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 SB 406/99 | 11.04.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 96/00 | 08.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 16 SB 610/99 | 14.03.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 89/00 | 16.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 SB 1047/97 | 06.04.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 87/00 | 19.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 4 SB 534/00 | 26.07.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 86/01 | 19.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 SB 288/98 | 24.06.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 80/99 | 28.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 SB 289/00 | 01.08.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 79/01 | 13.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 SB 83/99 | 23.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 79/00 | 23.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 SB 512/98 | 22.07.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 75/99 | 23.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 Vs 917/93 | 24.04.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 73/96 | 21.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 16 SB 807/99 | 16.03.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 69/00 | 08.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 10 SB 1263/98 | 28.10.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 66/00 | 28.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 6 SB 696/97 | 06.12.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 61/00 | 08.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 SB 810/98 | 07.06.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 57/99 | 20.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 SB 1040/96 | 08.10.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 57/01 | 11.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 SB 171/98 | 11.03.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 53/99 | 05.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 18 SB 1136/98 | 04.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 52/00 | 08.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 4 SB 849/00 | 02.03.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 37/01 | 28.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 16 SB 225/00 | 05.04.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 SB 36/01 | 16.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3447 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3447 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3447 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 86150, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 108/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-108-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-108-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 107/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-107-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-107-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 107/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-107-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-107-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 105/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-105-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-105-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 104/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-104-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-104-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 103/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-103-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-103-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 102/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-102-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-102-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 96/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-96-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-96-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 89/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-89-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-89-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 87/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-87-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-87-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 86/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-86-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-86-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 80/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-80-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-80-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 79/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-79-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-79-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 79/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-79-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-79-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 75/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-75-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-75-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 73/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-73-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-73-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 69/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-69-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-69-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 66/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-66-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-66-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 61/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-61-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-61-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 57/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-57-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-57-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108810 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 57/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-57-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-57-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 53/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-53-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-53-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 52/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-52-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:12:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:12:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-52-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 37/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-37-01-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:12:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:12:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-37-01-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 36/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-36-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:12:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:12:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-36-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 108869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 108/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-108-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:13:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:13:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-108-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a9b78ab7e4753a7585b9a062e25c8fda [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:80b7dba9402ef367fba472744d3deecb:0.91956300 1748654204 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.