| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 331/14 | 19.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 115/17 | 25.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/18 R | 28.05.2019 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 19. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 EG 3/19 | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 19. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 EG 4/19 | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 19. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 2 R 151/12 | 12.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 70/16 | 06.09.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 32 AS 2150/20 ER | 24.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 19. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 16 KA 143/16 | 03.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 11/17 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 7/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 137/17 | 24.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 24/17 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 775/16 | 31.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 29/17 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 771/16 | 31.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 31/17 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 769/16 | 31.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 30/17 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 58/11 | 05.10.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 218/17 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 66/11 | 30.10.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 110/15 ZVW | 05.07.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 331/14 | 19.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 115/17 | 25.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/18 R | 28.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 116/14 | 19.01.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 42/16 | 18.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 21/17 R | 26.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 KR 97/14 | 31.03.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 159/16 | 18.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/17 R | 06.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 2 KR 97/14 | 31.03.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 159/16 | 18.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/17 R | 06.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19. November 2020 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 558/15 KL | 19.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 11/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 50 KR 135/18 | 17.12.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 100/19 | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 18. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 642 bis 645/17 | 25.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 59/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 18. November 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 SF 318/18 EK KR | 04.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. November 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 19 KA 12/16 WA | 25.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 69/17 | 26.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 KR 447/19 ER | 03.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 397/19 B ER | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 18. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 244/19 | 18.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 243/19 | 18.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 183/19 | 18.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 346 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 346 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 346 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 331/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-331-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-331-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 EG 3/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-eg-3-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-eg-3-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 EG 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-eg-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-eg-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 151/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-151-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-151-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 2150/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-2150-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-2150-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 11/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-11-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-11-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 24/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-24-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-24-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 29/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-29-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-29-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 31/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-31-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-31-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 30/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-30-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-30-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 218/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-218-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-218-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 110/15 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-110-15-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-110-15-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 115/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-115-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-115-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 42/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-42-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:43:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:43:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-42-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 159/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-159-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-159-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 159/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-159-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-159-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 558/15 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-558-15-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:08:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:08:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-558-15-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 100/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-100-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-100-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 642 bis 645/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-642-bis-645-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-642-bis-645-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 318/18 EK KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-318-18-ek-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-318-18-ek-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 69/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-69-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-69-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 447/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-447-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-447-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 244/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-244-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-244-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 243/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-243-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-243-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 183/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-183-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-183-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 331/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-331-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-331-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ce1e04036e6019b1abd5fc5c38bec99a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9ad1194376efd7d6cf908353e7be42e3:0.21470200 1755536475 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.