| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 240/99 | 07.02.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 49/00 | 03.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/02 R | 25.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 20.07.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 06.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 45/02 R | 24.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 P 31/02 | 02.09.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 P 45/02 | 24.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 8/03 B | 05.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 RA 1186/97 | 10.11.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 15/13 RA 281/99 | 29.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 13/03 R | 24.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 RA 403/01 | 17.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 3507/01 | 23.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 38/02 R | 06.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 RJ 5020/97 | 13.10.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 540/99 | 04.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 52/02 R | 11.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 KA 3853/98 | 08.11.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1055/01 | 08.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 32/02 R | 21.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 16.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 38/02 R | 02.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 AL 2776/98 | 07.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 AL 2392/01 | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 59/02 R | 05.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 AL 51/00 | 14.03.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AL 150/00 | 30.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 AL 3/03 R | 29.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 28 (23) AL 77/98 | 07.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 103/00 | 11.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 AL 1/02 R | 29.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | 26.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 4/03 R | 14.08.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 AL 3117/00 | 23.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2437/01 | 26.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AL 46/02 R | 03.07.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 4 V 3153/00 | 14.03.2001 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 5 V 243/01 | 07.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 5/02 R | 12.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 24 VG 1258/99 | 11.07.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 8/01 R | 12.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 5 VG 12/99 | 15.06.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 11/0 | 29.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 4/02 R | 12.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 RA 327/01 | 09.10.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 12/02 | 23.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 37/02 R | 18.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 RJ 542/00 A | 29.03.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 RJ 360/01 | 23.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 Ar 558/96 | 10.12.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 35/97 | 04.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 2 RJ 668/99 A | 08.09.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 35/01 | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 RJ 802/00 A | 11.04.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 359/01 | 20.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 RJ 2/97 | 12.05.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 RJ 358/99 | 19.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 Ar 704/95 | 10.04.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 RJ 358/97 | 27.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 12 RJ 55/97 A | 13.12.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 358/01 | 12.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 3 RJ 1734/97 A | 11.11.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 358/00 | 08.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 86600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 45/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-45-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-45-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 8/03 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-8-03-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-8-03-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 13/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-13-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-13-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 38/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-38-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-38-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82641 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 52/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-52-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-52-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 32/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-32-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-32-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 38/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-38-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-38-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 59/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-59-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-59-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 AL 3/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-al-3-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-al-3-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 AL 1/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-al-1-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-al-1-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 4/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-4-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-4-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AL 46/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-al-46-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-al-46-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 5/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-5-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-5-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 8/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-8-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-8-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 4/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-4-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-4-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 37/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-37-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-37-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 RJ 360/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-rj-360-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:00:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:00:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-rj-360-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 RJ 35/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-rj-35-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 15:00:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 14:00:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-rj-35-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 35/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-35-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-35-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 359/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-359-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-359-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 RJ 358/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-rj-358-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-rj-358-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 RJ 358/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-rj-358-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-rj-358-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 358/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-358-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-358-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 107894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 358/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-358-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:59:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:59:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-358-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:57:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:57:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 44c1f5f0e02684779c6b8e160e02da88 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:723fc5e422f73b95100f2cace8577d7b:0.71853400 1748001273 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.