| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 101/19 | 03.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 83/20 | 06.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 95/15 | 08.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 167/12 | 12.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 263/19 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 262/19 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 261/19 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 293/17 | 09.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 34 SB 547/19 | 24.09.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 18. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 SO 243/17 | 29.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 96/18 | 05.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 SB 355/19 ZVW | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 VG 3/18 | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 18 KR 1202/11 | 27.05.2013 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 17. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 26 VE 4/14 | 16.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 8/18 | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 10/19 B | 15.05.2019 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 R 116/16 | 20.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 481/17 | 13.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 422/15 | 02.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 139/17 | 13.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 90/18 B | 16.04.2019 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 320/14 | 20.08.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 291/15 | 21.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 61/18 B | 12.12.2018 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 RS 40/13 | 11.09.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 22/19 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 16. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 29 AS 2444/19 ER | 28.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1170/19 B ER | 29.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 544/19 | 23.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 125/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 14. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 92/15 | 17.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 141/19 | 26.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 14. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 15 AS 1020/17 | 06.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 573/19 | 26.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 14. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 544/19 | 23.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 125/20 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 15 AS 1020/17 | 06.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 573/19 | 26.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 92/15 | 17.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 141/19 | 26.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 347 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 347 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 347 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133626 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 83/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-83-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-83-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 95/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-95-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-95-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 167/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-167-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-167-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 263/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-263-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-263-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 262/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-262-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-262-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 261/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-261-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-261-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 293/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-293-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-293-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 SB 547/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-sb-547-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-sb-547-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 96/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-96-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-96-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 355/19 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-355-19-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-355-19-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 VG 3/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-vg-3-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-vg-3-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 1202/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-1202-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-1202-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 VE 4/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ve-4-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ve-4-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 116/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-116-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-116-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 422/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-422-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-422-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 320/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-320-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-320-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 22/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-22-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-22-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160470 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1170/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1170-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1170-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 544/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-544-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-544-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 92/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-92-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-92-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 1020/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-1020-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-1020-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 125/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-125-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-125-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 573/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-573-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-573-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 141/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-141-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-141-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d17fa1ea4902e9551bb369bd0c2ceb71 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e1899c027169bb73bb3fe402df6df8f1:0.53787500 1755542754 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.