| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 28 SO 18/16 | 07.10.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 59/18 ZVW | 09.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 7/19 B | 25.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 289/13 | 22.10.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 78/14 | 19.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 26 SO 71/14 | 17.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 304/15 | 14.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 87/18 B | 07.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 22 EG 41/12 | 02.09.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 15/15 | 24.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 22 EG 40/12 | 02.09.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 14/15 | 24.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 SO 81/14 | 30.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 244/16 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 10/18 R | 04.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 SO 81/14 | 30.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 244/16 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 10/18 R | 04.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 67/09 | 24.08.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 214/16 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 16/18 R | 29.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 4 R 270/15 | 29.06.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 256/17 | 24.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 8/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 11 R 268/15 | 10.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 310/17 | 13.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 236/18 B | 11.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 11 R 268/15 | 10.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 310/17 | 13.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 236/18 B | 11.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 313/12 | 28.04.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 195/15 | 08.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 4/18 R | 20.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 330/13 | 06.02.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 11/15 | 11.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 16/18 R | 11.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 23/14 | 10.12.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 2/15 | 11.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 12/18 R | 11.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 939/11 | 11.03.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 76/16 | 09.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/18 R | 14.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 137/15 | 12.04.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 95/16 | 07.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 10/17 R | 27.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 576/16 | 13.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 12/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 753/18 | 06.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 114/19 | 31.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 389/13 | 22.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 46/16 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 37/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 298/18 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 337/19 | 09.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 12 KR 243/16 | 11.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 248/18 | 02.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 SF 136/20 E | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 17/18 | 06.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 338/18 | 28.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 2661/15 | 17.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 539/17 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 KR 172/17 | 14.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 146/18 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 350 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 350 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 350 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 59/18 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-59-18-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-59-18-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 78/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-78-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-78-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 304/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-304-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-304-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 15/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-15-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-15-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 14/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-14-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-14-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 244/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-244-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-244-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 244/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-244-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-244-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 214/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-214-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-214-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 256/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-256-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-256-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 310/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-310-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-310-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 310/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-310-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-310-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 195/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-195-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-195-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 11/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-11-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-11-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 2/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-2-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-2-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 76/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-76-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-76-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 95/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-95-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-95-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 12/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-12-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-12-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 114/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-114-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-114-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 46/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-46-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-46-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 337/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-337-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-337-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 248/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-248-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-248-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 136/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-136-20-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-136-20-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 338/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-338-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-338-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 539/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-539-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-539-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 146/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-146-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-146-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 59/18 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-59-18-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-59-18-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fcfc7b35244d6bb3978bab046f98cad0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fb4070c8b61803d0cfd4331616852543:0.95523500 1758055591 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.